Donic Bluefire M1 reviews
Viewed 8953 times
Zoom
This product has been viewed 8953 times.
Viewed 8953 times
Brand
Donic
Price
60
Type
Inverted
Sponge
 
Speed
   9.5
Spin
   9.2
Control
   7.0
Manufacturer stats
Speed
   8.3
Spin
   8.2
Control
   7.4
Durability
   7.0
User stats
+ Description
Donic's new Bluefire is a completely new rubber development offering top speed The new high-tech generation of rubbers in the proven Formula FD3-technology has been developed as a result of the perfect combination of the large pored blue sponge with an extremely spinny top surface rubber.
Very Good
4.0
4.0 9 reviews
Overall Rating
52
44
3 3
2 0
10
9 reviews posted by TTD users
Latest reviews Most Liked reviews 9 reviews posted by TTD users
10 reviews
Latest Equipment Reviews
Click for More


    0 people liked this review
    Posted 11-17-2017
    Andrelol15's Avatar Andrelol15 Reviews(1)
    3.00 quickly broken the Rubber
    • Good Topspin
    • Lots of Spin
    • Powerfully
    • Control
    • Too Expensive
    • too much Hard
    Hey i have buyed the donic bluefire m1 for 6 Months. I have test it out. The Rubber is very Good but if you a amateur then DONT buy this. Because if you Played , you have Good Topspin and spin but you dont have Control. You cant Control any Balls its too hard to do it. I have play this Rubber 3 Months and it was Broken.
    (I have played 12 hours per Week).The upper rubber is extremely grippy and very tight. But when it comes to topspin against block, he goes forward powerfully.
    Reminds me strongly of the tenergy 05. The rubber is very light on the racket. Sorry for my bad English. (my blade was Dhs 6002)

    User stats

    • Speed
         8.5
    • Spin
         8
    • Control
         3
    • Durability
         4
    0 people liked this review
    0 people liked this review
    Posted 09-15-2016
    5.00 Blue miracle indeed!
    • Spin variance
    • Blocks well
    • Tolerance
    • Colours differ
    • Developed stroke
    Hi All!

    I was happy to switch to this rubber on my FH and soon I will try it on my BH. I was searching for a nice FH rubber after trying Baracuda, M2, T05, MX-P, EL-P, JP01, MAXXX 500. Lastly I sticked with MX-P for a long time, but I found lack of control in countertopspins and some blocking. So I searched for something similar ESN rubber, then came up with the M1, because they have the same sponge hardness, a bit different pore size, but still very similar sponge. The only big difference is the topsheet, because M1 has a softer topsheet. In previous reviews I read that M1 is better in counterspinning. Since M2 is my all time favourite BH rubber and I played with it on FH in the last 2 months, I was finally convinced, that I need more power but keeping the same characterictics of the Bluefire M series. My blade is a Walnder World Champion '89 OFF FL with 92 gr weight.

    They say a blade is responsible for 20% of the characterictics of the complete bat. So I must speak of the blade first just a few words, if you wish to learn more search my review on the blade section. Waldner WC '89 has an interesting soft feel to it making it possible to play a fine ALL+ tempo touch play when needed, but has the speed of an OFF blade. With M1 you can really sink the ball into the rubber and the sponge, which generates awsome spin besides the prolonged ball contact time.

    Counterhits
    During counterhits the rubber is quite linear, and very easy to control. The ball clearly engages the sponge and jumps off it with a decent speed. But the topsheet of the rubber does not kick the ball fast, it let's the ball sink towards the sponge, which gives time for error correction. Some people who are XIOM Omega and Butterfly Tenergy fans/users don't really like this kind of lack of catapult, despite the speed of the ball is the same. I think this feature helps less experienced players.

    Smashes

    This is where the rubber shines, fast and precise balls with a distinctive feel of the contact. Many players mentioned above complain about that, but the blue sponge transfers more vibrations, which comes in handy when using composite blades.

    Looping and Counterlooping
    If a rubber is a good hitter it is probably a shameful looper. I must say 'A-A', wrong! The rubber has a nice topsheet which is grippy and after some abrasion it is still grippy and lifts the ball high. Heavy underspin balls can be lifted with ease and huge spin. Due to the soft topsheet it does not matter if you do a slow or a fast topspin, rhe rubber will help. I can also confirm that this rubber is more stable when counterlooping or when powerlooping, than MX-P. Some times during these shots I often hit the ball into the net without any distictive feeling or feedback why my shot failed. The blue sponge gives the feedback way more clear then the red one. Speed of the loop is at the top end. The arc is maybe a bit less pronounced, but still high. I found that the bluefire sponge has some unique characteristics, which can be observed when looping:

    1. The uneven pore size of the sponge gives an 'extra kick' feeling. Even when the rubber is worn or 'dead', so the booster evaporated, you can still get this kick, which always ensures you, that you applied enough force for the loop.

    2. Arc of the ball is different, because it is not so symmetrical and dome shaped, like Tenergy 05. It's peak is more over the opponent's side, not over the net like Tenergy 05, but over the center of the opponents side or over the first third of the table. From that point the ball falls to the table with unpleasant speed and spin. Also the ball jumps off the table just like looping with any other professional rubbers. This forces them a bit more further or simply the miscalculate the ball as a long shot.

    But still the rubber topsheet catapult is less pronounced, so it remains controllable, some don't like this, because they want explosive power.

    Blocking these shots is just like a normal counterhit with the same circumstances like counterlooping with MX-P. I believe the feedback is stronger so I can adjust better.

    Over the table

    Short game is where this rubber can outshine catapult rubbers. There is plenty spin generaion in the rubber over the net, so small pushes will be loaded with underspin, and flicks will be easy to lift and spin also. Serving is funny, because you must have some developed technique and serves. I mostly use the topsheet only to generate spin, which I still find enough. With M2 I could engage the sponge also, but I am still able to do heavy and low underspin, that my opponent pushes into the net or it simply bounces 3 times on their side. I don't really do chops or chop blocks and this rubber is not really a defensive one.

    Summary
    The Bluefire M series (excluding Big Slam) is a very linear and easy to play rubber family if you consider their sponge hardness and playing capabilities. M1 is almost the fastest (M1 Turbo is a bit faster) rubber with the speed and spin capabilities of a modern offensive rubber. The Bluefire gives a bit more control and feel to the game, not to mention the sound of the sponge. Blade selection for the rubbers are wide, I found out that these rubbers can tolerate many types of materials. Cover layer of the blade should be medium hard to soft, Valnut covered Ovtcharov Senso Soft Carbon was playable but the looping was less pronounced, but smashes and hits worked fine. On Koto and Limba they were an offensive yet controllable miracle. On Hinoki and Spruce use M2 or M1 because these are soft woods and the blade will feel mushy, but the spin is awsome with more control. Most times I use Carbon, Arylate Carbon, Kevlar Carbon, Zylon Carbon blades, which do give more power to the shots and combine well with these rubbers. For me ALC blades with Tenergy 05 are a bit numb, can play with them effectively, but I miss the feeling. Well with the Bluefire I loved to play on ALC blades, because they had some feeling after all. Most times I use Kiri core ply looping blades, because you know... I loop. For advanced players ideal for both sides, thor intermediate players try it on FH first. Durability is at the top from my perspective, let me tell you why. I use Bluefire more than 4 years now and all I can say they are up for 200 hours of gameplay at least, mine Black M3 lasted 300 hours (incl training camps so I calculated the actual playing time). Some pro players who regulary have new sheets every 3 months can say that XX brand is better because most of them only wipe their rubbers with their hand and vapor from their breath. (I do this also during play). But at home I also apply rubber cleaner to remove dust, fat and oil from the surface. So it is easy to come to a conclusion if you see abrasion that the rubber is worn out, because the other brand does not look like that. I played with an MX-P for 3 years reboostering it from time to time, at the end it was like an FX-P with more power and still loops with tons of spin, but it looks like trash... I would say that is durability, performance over time! The M series is durable just like any other top brands. I use a sheet for a year, with 2-3 reglueing and 2 reboostering (to original size) to keep it at maximum performance. Black topsheet is harder, than the red one.

    Price here is ~26€ so I will stick with it.

    Sorry for the long post, hope it helps.

    User stats

    • Speed
         9
    • Spin
         9
    • Control
         10
    • Durability
         9.6
    0 people liked this review
    1 people liked this review
    Posted 06-08-2016
    Luis Nasche's Avatar Luis Nasche Reviews(1)
    5.00 Powerful
    • Speed
    • Explosive Power
    • Beaultiful sound
    Outstanding offensive rubber.

    M1 is a fast, hard, heavy and bouncy offensive high throw rubber with very good spin.

    Despite being really fast, M1 is controllable, has a decent short game with good touch, but you have to be careful with your pushes because it is a bouncy rubber.

    It's good for active and passive blocks and works great flat hitting over the table. M1 top sheet has good aderence making it easy to lift underspin, but you need a well developed full stroke to unleash all the potential of this beast because players with a light or underdeveloped stroke often will not find anything but net. With a correct stroke it is a high throw rubber with a nice arc and once the sponge is working the amount of spin and speed available are really high.

    M1 is usable over the table, but it's a powerful offensive rubber that really shines away from the table on power loops. It's easy to clear the net with this rubber with forehand or backhand if your stroke is correct.

    Spin on serves is good, but since it is a bouncy rubber you may pay attention to keep the ball low.

    There is not anything on the offensive game that this rubber can't do well.

    If you are an offensive player that like to kill the points whenever the opportunity raises it is a great tool, but if you play passively with lazy strokes it's better look elsewhere.



    User stats

    • Speed
         9.6
    • Spin
         9.2
    • Control
         8.1
    • Durability
         8.5
    1 people liked this review
    0 people liked this review
    Posted 02-27-2016
    3.00 Decent not the beat
    This rubber is a catapult. Fast rubber for huge attacking strokes and above average control. The only drawbacks-admittedly big ones are a lack of spin and a lower than average throw angle. The throw angle is really only a problem on my backhand side (I use it on both sides) and produces a lot of service errors in the net. The throw angle being preferential ill move onto spin. My overall impression is that for someone who is an all out attacker this is your rubber. It is great from behind the table as well as on the table but doesn't have much of a touch game.
    However, I do think Bluefire m1 turbo is better than the m1 version.

    User stats

    • Speed
         7.4
    • Spin
         6.4
    • Control
         8.9
    • Durability
         9.8
    0 people liked this review
    0 people liked this review
    Posted 06-07-2015
    3.00 Nice rubber
    • Speed
    • Spin
    • Control
    It's a very good rubber for offensive and attacking players. You get alot of spin. It's a very good rubber close to the table :)

    User stats

    • Speed
         6.9
    • Spin
         8.9
    • Control
         5.5
    • Durability
         6.2
    0 people liked this review
    0 people liked this review
    Posted 04-17-2015
    4.00 not 4 everybody
    • enough speed
    • very spinny
    • low lifetime
    i love it, but i have to change it after 2-3 months (~16 hrs trainig in a week)

    User stats

    • Speed
         6.8
    • Spin
         8.9
    • Control
         7.8
    • Durability
         4.3
    0 people liked this review
    0 people liked this review
    Posted 02-06-2015
    TTD Team Manager's Avatar TTD Team Manager Reviews(5)
    4.00 Good for fast players
    • Speed
    • Control
    I play with the M1 on my forehand and have found it a good rubber for my style of play (at the table, counter-spin, fast). I'd recommend this rubber to others who like to play off the bounce table tennis, who also prefer to counter attack rather than block. The control isn't really the best compared to other rubbers I have used hence why it is an all out attackers rubber. Once pushed into defensive shots, this rocket of a rubber turns very average. Great for fast and spinny open ups!

    User stats

    • Speed
         9
    • Spin
         8
    • Control
         7.2
    • Durability
         7.3
    0 people liked this review
    0 people liked this review
    Posted 01-29-2015
    4.00 High quality rubber from Donic
    • Excellent speed
    • Direct
    in this video review I used the Donic Waldner Senso Carbon blade and @Tom used the Donic Ovtcharov blade.



    User stats

    • Speed
         9.2
    • Spin
         8.8
    • Control
         8.8
    • Durability
         8.6
    0 people liked this review
    0 people liked this review
    Posted 11-28-2014
    4.00 Good rubber for those who can't afford tenergy
    • Very fast
    • Cheapish
    • Lacks some grip
    I used this rubber for a period of time as a replacement for tenergy 05. It definitely has the speed but not the grip to match. I enjoyed using the rubber but tenergy was just that bit better so I went back. It wasn't very durable, only lasted a few weeks when I was playing full time.

    User stats

    • Speed
         8.5
    • Spin
         7
    • Control
         7
    • Durability
         4.4
    0 people liked this review
Create a new Topic:
Title is required.