This user has no status.
Hi,
I have question regarding bty Liu Shiwen blade. On the one hand, on almost all the forums people write it is awesome looping blade, with great dwell time and flex allowing to generate huge spin, on the other hand, Liu Shiwen is known for her close to the table machine-gun like speed, counterhitting like monster. Isn't it contradiction ? I thought that stiff/hard blade are much better in close to the table game, giving your opponent less time to react.
Also what rubbers would You reccomend for such a blade ? Tenergy05 would be of course, great for looping, flips etc. so it would be probably 1st choice for fh, but what about bh ? In't that blade to soft for something like rakza 7 soft, tibhar fx-p ? And I think the short game/recieves would be really hard with t05 on bh. What about t64 or t80 here ?
I will be able to test that blade (83g) and I am thinking which rubbers should I pick for that, taking into account those 2 different playing style I wrote about at the beggining. What am I missing here ?
I have question regarding bty Liu Shiwen blade. On the one hand, on almost all the forums people write it is awesome looping blade, with great dwell time and flex allowing to generate huge spin, on the other hand, Liu Shiwen is known for her close to the table machine-gun like speed, counterhitting like monster. Isn't it contradiction ? I thought that stiff/hard blade are much better in close to the table game, giving your opponent less time to react.
Also what rubbers would You reccomend for such a blade ? Tenergy05 would be of course, great for looping, flips etc. so it would be probably 1st choice for fh, but what about bh ? In't that blade to soft for something like rakza 7 soft, tibhar fx-p ? And I think the short game/recieves would be really hard with t05 on bh. What about t64 or t80 here ?
I will be able to test that blade (83g) and I am thinking which rubbers should I pick for that, taking into account those 2 different playing style I wrote about at the beggining. What am I missing here ?