This user has no status.
Hi guys.
I am looking for a rubber on the backhand. How good is hurricane 3-50 for the backhand.
I currently use aurus and like it but I am looking for something cheaper (20€ on tt11 for hurricane 3-50 )
Andy, in your opinion, which will pair better with H3-50 in terms of speed, Adidas Avenger Carbon or Stiga Infinity?
Thanks Andy.
I ordered the h3 50 and I'll post a review when I play with it.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk
First up, H3-50 isn't a bad rubber when unboosted. It's slow because of the tack, but does speed up a bit once it's broken in. It feels more flexible than regular H3 Neo, but less powerful. It needs a fast blade (your Force Pro is good) and active technique, but works well with the new ball. Your BH technique is the crucial factor - if you play short, weak strokes on the BH side then you won't get much out of it. Being tacky it is quite sensitive to incoming spin when playing passively.
Hey Andy, Im currently using H3 neo provincial unboosted 38deg (my friend said I should've bought the 39/40 one)... can you tell me the different between the degree of sponge for chinese tacky rubber? I read somewhere softer sponge = easier to loop/spin, but my friend said that's for tensor rubber.
Also should I boost my h3 neo? or will it be too soft (because it's already 38deg)? Thanks
I got myself the skyline 3-60 as that felt like a better option. I like it on the backhand. It's a bit slow but still very playable and I find it easier than tensors to execute close to table shots(taps, flicks, drop). I usually step around to the forehand side if I go far off from the table so the slow speed is not a problem. It's not very slow however, just slower than modern Tensors that I am used to. But now I find it fine after having adjusted to the rubber (or the rubber breaking in maybe)
How are you doing with the h 3-50?
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk
I don't think the skyline 3-60 is very bouncy. It's almost the same (or just a little bit more) than the hurricane 8 I use on my fh
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk
If you could,then just check how 3-60 and h8 play with old celluloid balls. Hence if I get bored with my h3 neo,I would go for it.I'm using plastic balls
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk
Yeah,I did read somewhere that these rubbers tend to work awkwardly with old balls. Thanks for confirming! Hence I would go for that rubber when I only stick with plastic balls,and don't have to play with celluloid .I do play with celluloid every now and then.
These rubbers do not work well with celluloid. I do not why but the ball skids through the rubbers as if the rubbers have no grip and the balls goes into the net. It just doesn't stay on the the racket as long as I would like in order to place the ball. So a very fast action is required when playing with celluloid as compared to plastic. But now I am comfortable with both the balls and I don't mind playing with either.
However the rubbers work better with plastic balls or maybe the plastic balls are better than celluloid.
Btw I play with seamless ones(Stag , Xushaofa)
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk
I don't know, i might not be a perfect guy as I haven't used plastic balls, but i did face less spin. Just think like this,,what if h3 neo was considerably less tacky when you chop or loop? Also, I might be wrong but I felt that the dwell I got was less.. Not that awesome in reviewing balls,but I will ask my friend, who is a great stable player,and I am sure he must have evaluated better.What do you think about the h3n with plastic balls? Is it good or are you facing any problems that you are looking for something else?
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk