This user has no status.
Member
I was wondering how the skyline 3-60 (medium) holds up against a european/japanese tensor rubber. I'm searching for a rubber that is less speedy/bouncy then currently used tensor (fh) without losing the possibility of really killing a ball with a fast drive.
I tried the skyline 3 neo but to no avail, it seemed to be the perfect rubber for me when chopping/passive play and during open-ups, when blocking it was as if the ball sticked to the rubber and i could control everything, but again it missed a bit that cracking speed. No doubt it's at least in part the fault of my inperfect technique, but still.
i used the 3 neo on a ALL+ blade (donic epox powerallround), so what if i use the 3-60 with a faster stiffer blade (i was thinking carbonado 90-like, not to fast, but enough power)
thanks for any comments
I tried the skyline 3 neo but to no avail, it seemed to be the perfect rubber for me when chopping/passive play and during open-ups, when blocking it was as if the ball sticked to the rubber and i could control everything, but again it missed a bit that cracking speed. No doubt it's at least in part the fault of my inperfect technique, but still.
i used the 3 neo on a ALL+ blade (donic epox powerallround), so what if i use the 3-60 with a faster stiffer blade (i was thinking carbonado 90-like, not to fast, but enough power)
thanks for any comments