Is it legal to have more than one rubber on one side of a racket?

Superdragon said:

As long as all the ITTF logos were visible, would it be legal to have more than one rubber on a side?

Let’s say that somebody had 60% of one side of a racket covered with one rubber and the other 40% with a rubber that had a completely different characteristic. Would this be a completely legal way to frustrate the opponent, as they would have a hard time figuring out what was coming back at them?

Has anybody ever done this?

Click to expand...

UpSideDownCarl said:

This rule also has some impact on the issue:

2.4.7.1 Slight deviations from continuity of surface or uniformity of colour due to accidental damage or wear may be allowed provided that they do not significantly change the characteristics of the surface.
​

There is no possible way that two separate surfaces would NOT change the playing characteristics, which was the point of why you thought it would be a nifty trick. It would be sneaky and opponent's could not be able to tell what you just did to the ball, whether you spun it or are letting spin reversal occur.

So, the idea, is basically an attempt to circumvent things like the reason they made the two color rule so pips or antispin players could not use black for both sides so it was harder to see if they used grippy or non-frictioned rubber on the shot they made.

If you have never seen footage from before the two color rule, it might be worth watching a match or two. It is torture. Over and over you have people missing and making crazy errors because the opponent is twiddling between grippy and frictionless rubbers and they are both the same color. The top level pros looked like they were not even fit to play in Aunt Mildred's garage.

Click to expand...