Search results

I have played with a Gewo Hype XT Pro40.0 on my FH for several years to my complete satisfaction. We replaced it with a Nexxus EL Pro45.0, but that was not a success on my Andro TP_Ligna CI stick. Now we have a Hype XT Pro40 on our BH on the SDC CI blade.

I watched a bit of your videos. Your technique is pretty good, really, both FH and BH. I think you mainly miss training from/with multiballs, agility and...competition at a slightly higher level. You also have to be "ready" on every ball. You tend to step back on your second ball, why? You also...

Lol, I'm just stating and I certainly don't want to hurt anyone with this. Apparently the allocation of levels in the USA is completely different than in Belgium. If you had level 2000-2200 in Belgium, you would lean towards the sub-top of Belgium and you would already be between places 200-300...

Not for one or the other, but if I see that player playing and he has 2000-2200 USTT-level, he would struggle to reach level 1500 in Belgium I'm afraid. I didn't know/don't know, but apparently the level with in the USA is a lot lower than in Belgium. i am really surprised about this.:oops:

That would surprise me very much. Of all material players I know from my former training (+40 years ago) and shortly afterwards (beginners or not very advanced) they all started with LP, SP or anti, just because they technically could not perform a certain stroke until in detail with a inverted...

I wonder why such a young person takes up SP and anti rubbers? Coach?

I got the message through their FB page.

Apparently Mattias Falck is playing with a Falck Carbon, Rakza PO (FH) and a Rakza X on his BH

You mean, back in quarantine? Oh nooooo!!! :ROFLMAO:

I agree with that but how are they going to check that? Are they going to check all rubbers before they stick, just before a match has to start? :unsure:

Indeed, the question is, why boost at all? Move your arm a little bit faster!

:oeps: What a huge and expensive blade!

As I wrote above, they make the playing field remarkably smaller with all the consequences for their opponent. And that result is what you write above. Delete that part from rule 2.6.4 if the umpires do not rebuke it anyway but should normally call a let.

Yes I know that, but no wrong service by serving over his baseline and so above the table.

And indeed, also Wang Chuqin. Like I wrote, 80% of the top 20 players sin there. Ma Long, never Fan, frequently Truls, never Lim, allways, Hugo, rarely Harimoto, most of the time never, but sporadically Wang, most of the time Liang, most of the time Lin Yun-Ju, many times Ovtcharov, never ect...

Also him indeed!

As far as I can see you are more behind the table, Kay is much more to the side of the table. As a result, his services are very often touched above the table when he throws the ball upright. He could correct this if he threw his ball slightly backwards. The champion in this is Lim Jong-Hoon, he...

A kind of VAR, with sensor lines, transversely in line at the head of the table. Problem solved.

Fixing the video above, maybe Ricardo hides the ball several times but serves behind his "baseline" each time. That cannot be said of Kay, because almost all his services are taken above the table, beyond his "baseline". Surely the referee on the raised seat must have been able to determine this...

Why should a professional player first report that he is affected? Even without being affected, an umpire must revoke those services.