NextLevel said:
...The blocker said there is a noticeable difference in his view between the backhand quality and the forehand quality, so taking him at his word, and based on my usual experience where most people fear the spin on my backhand but fear the power of my forehand, I think he is likely right.
So I am just looking for what could add more spin. If I go for less power, for me that doesn't generate spin by itself - there has to be a technical adjustment related to that. You think taking the ball a bit later is the answer?
I always hear similar comments from much better players when I practice with them. They always tell me my BH is way more developed than my FH. I conclude it is because I can see the ball better and have a more natural control of my biomechanics there... somehow, it is easier for me to do a full variety of BH strokes with control... that lets me go for power or spin or consistency.
I am never good enough to test them in FH to FH low spin 25x-50x consecutive at the table, I rarely make that many at 3/4 speed consecutively. I never can do fast loop with them FH to FH for very long like I can do on BH. I can only do the FH to FH with spin or speed at mid to long distance. I think the doctor dropped me when I was born, somewhere, my head hit the ground, causing the hospital to replace the damaged floor tile, and I have never been able to play FH to FH at the table high speed with consistency since.
My brain seems to want more time on FH to see the ball. NL is much better than me in that department.
NL's current FH power comes from stabilizing his body with enough wide stance, being in position, starting the movement of the upper and lower arm with a swing hinge of his shoulder (powered by his upper back muscles)…
… He gets motion started that way and has a stable base. He does not need an ultra wide stance to stabilize a big hip and shoulder torqueing movement as he doesn't use those for power. He gets his power by allowing motion started and IMPULSING his upper bicep to snap the lower arm through the target. (and I suspect a real firming of grip at impact)
He doesn't use much wrist. His overall motion is quite long. His ability to see the ball, be in enough position, and time the arrival of ball to impact zone is excellent. His stroke has only a few moving parts (even if the motion is pretty long), is repeatable, and dependable under pressure. That sounds like the traits of a successful FH for his level... but NL rightfully seeks a Next Level FH.
My suggestion for a FH to consider is to...
Replace a lot of the long backswing and forward arm swing with using a tiny bit of leg and hip to shorten stroke, but get power...
- Do a few inches knee bend
- Push off with right leg some
- Do a quick explosion of hips rotation and forward move by a few inches
- Stay loose and allow that kinetic energy to reach shoulder area - allow it to go through (keep shoulder loose)
- Swing the upper and lower arm forward like his previous FH, but with a shorter backswing (don't need the longer swing to get energy generated)
- Impulse upper bicep to snap lower arm like previous FH, but less overall swing distance
- Impulse meaty part of lower arm by elbow to allow some wrist snap (not the slap or pronate kind)
- Impulse lower meaty arm muscle to firm up grip at impact
NL had adapted the FH seen in the vid due to his body not being able to get down and torque like a conventional FH... and he has adapted well.