• Join our newsletter: 
  • Welcome Guest


    Results 1 to 17 of 17
    1. Top | #1
      TTHopeful is offline
      says Dima... Amazing...
       
      Master TTD Member Country: England
      TTHopeful's Avatar
      Equipment:
      Blade Waldner Carbon
      Forehand Rubber Hurricane 3
      Backhand Rubber Tenergy 05

      Join Date
      Oct 2010
      Posts
      2,114
      Reviews
      Read 19 Reviews
      Liked 828 Times in 541 Posts

      Plastic ball vs Celluloid ball rubber wear..

      Plastic ball vs Celluloid ball rubber wear.

      Why does the Celluloid ball have greater friction then the plastic ball, yet the plastic ball still wears down rubbers faster? Bearing in mind both balls also weigh the same and are near enough identical in surface area.

    2. Top | #2
      6Finger is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      TTD Member Country: Croatia

      Equipment:
      Blade Yinhe/Galaxy Venus 14
      Forehand Rubber DHS Hurricane 3 NEO
      Backhand Rubber Tibhar Evolution MX-P

      Join Date
      Mar 2017
      Location
      Zagreb, Croatia
      Posts
      60
      Reviews
      Read 0 Reviews
      Liked 40 Times in 24 Posts
      Plastic balls surface is rougher, that's why the rubber wear down faster. How come it has lesser friction/spin than, maybe it's similar to racing car's having slick tires.

    3. Top | #3
      ajtatosmano2 is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Elite TTD Member Country: Hungary

      Equipment:
      Blade LHS Offensive 3.2
      Forehand Rubber Donic Acuda S1
      Backhand Rubber Donic Acuda S1

      Join Date
      Mar 2015
      Location
      Hungary
      Posts
      1,221
      Reviews
      Read 3 Reviews
      Liked 955 Times in 543 Posts
      Maybe you started to use stronger shots?

    4. Top | #4
      Baal is offline
      says Ba'al has spoken
       
      Master TTD Member


      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Houston, Texas
      Posts
      2,643
      Reviews
      Read 8 Reviews
      Liked 4,468 Times in 1,816 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by 6Finger View Post
      Plastic balls surface is rougher, that's why the rubber wear down faster. How come it has lesser friction/spin than, maybe it's similar to racing car's having slick tires.
      The spin per se can be explained by the greater size and weight of 40+ balls. These new balls all have more inertia, so you won't get the same angular momentum on the ball, all other things being equal.

      I think different plastic balls do have differences in surface roughness that affect how they behave after they bounce, though, and in some cases even how they fly through the air. This also comes into play when they get very smooth from wear.

      I definitely have the impression that plastic balls wear out most rubbers faster.

    5. The Following User Likes Baal's Post:

      UpSideDownCarl (05-23-2017)

    6. Top | #5
      NextLevel is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Master TTD Member Country: Nigeria

      Equipment:
      Blade Butterfly Hadraw VR
      Forehand Rubber Tibhar MX-K
      Backhand Rubber Tibhar MX-K

      Join Date
      Oct 2014
      Location
      Somewhere Good in the US
      Posts
      8,121
      Reviews
      Read 16 Reviews
      Liked 12,358 Times in 5,452 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Baal View Post
      The spin per se can be explained by the greater size and weight of 40+ balls. These new balls all have more inertia, so you won't get the same angular momentum on the ball, all other things being equal.

      I think different plastic balls do have differences in surface roughness that affect how they behave after they bounce, though, and in some cases even how they fly through the air. This also comes into play when they get very smooth from wear.

      I definitely have the impression that plastic balls wear out most rubbers faster.
      But I also get the impression that the increased surface friction and less spin potential make the used rubbers usable for longer. I can loop with rubbers that I would have discarded ages ago with the cell ball. Or maybe my technique is just better and I am overthinking it.
      Cobra Kai TT Exponent - No mercy in this dojo, no matter your rating or the score. All spin, no power or footwork.

    7. The Following 2 Users Like NextLevel's Post:

      TTHopeful (05-23-2017),UpSideDownCarl (05-23-2017)

    8. Top | #6
      Baal is offline
      says Ba'al has spoken
       
      Master TTD Member


      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Houston, Texas
      Posts
      2,643
      Reviews
      Read 8 Reviews
      Liked 4,468 Times in 1,816 Posts
      I can't tell because Karis M simply seems to not wear at all. It is weird. It looked like cheap bad rubber when I first glued it on (the look is deceiving), but it seems to have simply changed at all since early January. MX-P or T05 would be in bad shape by now.

    9. The Following 2 Users Like Baal's Post:

      FloKing (05-24-2017),UpSideDownCarl (05-24-2017)

    10. Top | #7
      NextLevel is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Master TTD Member Country: Nigeria

      Equipment:
      Blade Butterfly Hadraw VR
      Forehand Rubber Tibhar MX-K
      Backhand Rubber Tibhar MX-K

      Join Date
      Oct 2014
      Location
      Somewhere Good in the US
      Posts
      8,121
      Reviews
      Read 16 Reviews
      Liked 12,358 Times in 5,452 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Baal View Post
      I can't tell because Karis M simply seems to not wear at all. It is weird. It looked like cheap bad rubber when I first glued it on (the look is deceiving), but it seems to have simply changed at all since early January. MX-P or T05 would be in bad shape by now.
      Mine looks really bad. But it plays really well.

      BTW, it plays extra awesome with Dandoy Bioboost. Don't ask me how I know, I just do.

    11. The Following 4 Users Like NextLevel's Post:

      42andbackpains (05-24-2017),Suga D (05-24-2017),TTHopeful (05-23-2017),UpSideDownCarl (05-24-2017)

    12. Top | #8
      TTHopeful is offline
      says Dima... Amazing...
       
      Master TTD Member Country: England
      TTHopeful's Avatar
      Equipment:
      Blade Waldner Carbon
      Forehand Rubber Hurricane 3
      Backhand Rubber Tenergy 05

      Join Date
      Oct 2010
      Posts
      2,114
      Reviews
      Read 19 Reviews
      Liked 828 Times in 541 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Baal View Post
      The spin per se can be explained by the greater size and weight of 40+ balls. These new balls all have more inertia, so you won't get the same angular momentum on the ball, all other things being equal.

      I think different plastic balls do have differences in surface roughness that affect how they behave after they bounce, though, and in some cases even how they fly through the air. This also comes into play when they get very smooth from wear.

      I definitely have the impression that plastic balls wear out most rubbers faster.
      Ok that makes sense. I feel my rubbers wear out a lot quicker, do 40+ balls weigh more than celluloid balls baal?

    13. Top | #9
      fais is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Senior TTD Member Country: United States

      Equipment:
      Blade yinhe w-6 (shakehand)
      Forehand Rubber BH: yinhe mercury 2 (max/medium hard)
      Backhand Rubber FH: DHS TG3 Neo (2.15/39 degs)

      Join Date
      Dec 2013
      Location
      DFW,Texas
      Posts
      507
      Reviews
      Read 0 Reviews
      Liked 393 Times in 212 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Baal View Post
      The spin per se can be explained by the greater size and weight of 40+ balls. These new balls all have more inertia, so you won't get the same angular momentum on the ball, all other things being equal.
      sorry to be pedantic, but a minor correction - i think what you meant to say is that the angular momentum hasn't changed, rather the angular velocity has dipped due to the increase in inertia

    14. Top | #10
      ttmonster is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Master TTD Member

      Equipment:
      Blade Butterfly Zhang Jike, Long 5
      Forehand Rubber DHS Hurricane 8, DHS Hurricane 3 Provinicial, Karis H
      Backhand Rubber Tibhar Evolution MX-P , Xiom Omega Pro IV, Karis M

      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Posts
      3,671
      Reviews
      Read 0 Reviews
      Liked 4,400 Times in 2,216 Posts
      They are definitely more rigid compared to their celluloid counterparts , hence reduced distension and reduced spin , from common sense this should result into more momentum transfer into the rubber and hence more wear and tear of the sponge ...

      Quote Originally Posted by TTHopeful View Post
      Ok that makes sense. I feel my rubbers wear out a lot quicker, do 40+ balls weigh more than celluloid balls baal?
      Last edited by ttmonster; 05-23-2017 at 09:04 PM.

    15. The Following User Likes ttmonster's Post:

      TTHopeful (05-25-2017)

    16. Top | #11
      Archosaurus is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Master TTD Member Country: Finland

      Equipment:
      Blade STIGA Allround Evolution
      Forehand Rubber BH: Friendship 729 FX
      Backhand Rubber FH: Friendship 729 FX Blue Sponge

      Join Date
      Feb 2016
      Posts
      2,081
      Reviews
      Read 2 Reviews
      Liked 1,214 Times in 771 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by fais View Post
      sorry to be pedantic, but a minor correction - i think what you meant to say is that the angular momentum hasn't changed, rather the angular velocity has dipped due to the increase in inertia
      It's okay, fais.

      It rubs me the wrong way too, when people talk about "shifting the mass". What exactly are you taking away and re-attaching somewhere else?

    17. Top | #12
      ajtatosmano2 is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Elite TTD Member Country: Hungary

      Equipment:
      Blade LHS Offensive 3.2
      Forehand Rubber Donic Acuda S1
      Backhand Rubber Donic Acuda S1

      Join Date
      Mar 2015
      Location
      Hungary
      Posts
      1,221
      Reviews
      Read 3 Reviews
      Liked 955 Times in 543 Posts
      this should result into more momentum transfer into the rubber
      the angular momentum hasn't changed, rather the angular velocity has dipped due to the increase in inertia
      Are you sure you don't hit harder nowadays?

    18. Top | #13
      ttmonster is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Master TTD Member

      Equipment:
      Blade Butterfly Zhang Jike, Long 5
      Forehand Rubber DHS Hurricane 8, DHS Hurricane 3 Provinicial, Karis H
      Backhand Rubber Tibhar Evolution MX-P , Xiom Omega Pro IV, Karis M

      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Posts
      3,671
      Reviews
      Read 0 Reviews
      Liked 4,400 Times in 2,216 Posts
      That is true, because we subconsciously want to generate the same spin as before , but even otherwise I also feel that the wear and tear is more ...
      Quote Originally Posted by ajtatosmano2 View Post
      Are you sure you don't hit harder nowadays?

    19. The Following User Likes ttmonster's Post:

      ajtatosmano2 (05-23-2017)

    20. Top | #14
      laistrogian is offline
      This user has no status.
       
      Senior TTD Member Country: Australia

      Equipment:
      Blade Innerforce ALC
      Forehand Rubber Tenergy 80
      Backhand Rubber Rakza 7

      Join Date
      Feb 2016
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      635
      Reviews
      Read 0 Reviews
      Liked 382 Times in 234 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Baal View Post
      I can't tell because Karis M simply seems to not wear at all. It is weird. It looked like cheap bad rubber when I first glued it on (the look is deceiving), but it seems to have simply changed at all since early January. MX-P or T05 would be in bad shape by now.
      How does one play with 4 months old tenergy? All my tenergies are pretty unusable for me after 3.5 months as the topsheet pretty much lost its grip

    21. Top | #15
      Baal is offline
      says Ba'al has spoken
       
      Master TTD Member


      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Houston, Texas
      Posts
      2,643
      Reviews
      Read 8 Reviews
      Liked 4,468 Times in 1,816 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by TTHopeful View Post
      Ok that makes sense. I feel my rubbers wear out a lot quicker, do 40+ balls weigh more than celluloid balls baal?
      Yes. Most celluloid balls were 2.66 g or so and pretty much all were less than 2.70 -- certainly any of the ones ever used in tournaments. A lot of 40+ balls are 2.73 to 2.76. The DHS 40+ balls that first came out (the ones made of celluose acetate) were 2.78!

      The lightest 40+ ball is the Nittaku Premium at ~2.68 - 2.69 followed by the new D40+ at ~2.73. It may not seem like much more than celluloid but it makes a difference. Plastic balls also have slightly larger diameter. ABS balls are also harder and presumably deform less on contact. In fact, the increases weight and diameter is why the new balls are called 40+. I think it could increase the wear rate of rubber (also the surface texture and hardness of the new ball).

      By the way, ITTF simply says they are enforcing rules on ball weight that were always in place but which they had been lax in enforcing since pretty much forever. They slipped in the increase in size the same time that they mandated the change in material that they attributed to the "impending world-wide shortage of celluloid" which of course, does not exist. The increase in size was because of..... what? To slow the game down more? To reduce the spin? To make the ball easier to see? To try to beat the Chinese? Who knows. They have never given a reason as to why they suddenly found religion on that particular rule that they had never had before.

      I think a great deal of what people find different about playing with plastic balls can be attributed to their larger size. Of course, the cellulose acetate garbage is almost never round and bounces low and breaks all the time and is expensive and thankfully we will hopefully be rid of those.
      Last edited by Baal; 05-24-2017 at 01:42 AM.

    22. The Following 3 Users Like Baal's Post:

      Suga D (05-25-2017),TTHopeful (05-25-2017),ttmonster (05-24-2017)

    23. Top | #16
      Baal is offline
      says Ba'al has spoken
       
      Master TTD Member


      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Houston, Texas
      Posts
      2,643
      Reviews
      Read 8 Reviews
      Liked 4,468 Times in 1,816 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by fais View Post
      sorry to be pedantic, but a minor correction - i think what you meant to say is that the angular momentum hasn't changed, rather the angular velocity has dipped due to the increase in inertia
      Being pedantic is just another word for being correct. Thanks for the correction.
      Last edited by Baal; 05-24-2017 at 01:32 AM.

    24. Top | #17
      TTHopeful is offline
      says Dima... Amazing...
       
      Master TTD Member Country: England
      TTHopeful's Avatar
      Equipment:
      Blade Waldner Carbon
      Forehand Rubber Hurricane 3
      Backhand Rubber Tenergy 05

      Join Date
      Oct 2010
      Posts
      2,114
      Reviews
      Read 19 Reviews
      Liked 828 Times in 541 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Baal View Post
      Yes. Most celluloid balls were 2.66 g or so and pretty much all were less than 2.70 -- certainly any of the ones ever used in tournaments. A lot of 40+ balls are 2.73 to 2.76. The DHS 40+ balls that first came out (the ones made of celluose acetate) were 2.78!

      The lightest 40+ ball is the Nittaku Premium at ~2.68 - 2.69 followed by the new D40+ at ~2.73. It may not seem like much more than celluloid but it makes a difference. Plastic balls also have slightly larger diameter. ABS balls are also harder and presumably deform less on contact. In fact, the increases weight and diameter is why the new balls are called 40+. I think it could increase the wear rate of rubber (also the surface texture and hardness of the new ball).

      By the way, ITTF simply says they are enforcing rules on ball weight that were always in place but which they had been lax in enforcing since pretty much forever. They slipped in the increase in size the same time that they mandated the change in material that they attributed to the "impending world-wide shortage of celluloid" which of course, does not exist. The increase in size was because of..... what? To slow the game down more? To reduce the spin? To make the ball easier to see? To try to beat the Chinese? Who knows. They have never given a reason as to why they suddenly found religion on that particular rule that they had never had before.

      I think a great deal of what people find different about playing with plastic balls can be attributed to their larger size. Of course, the cellulose acetate garbage is almost never round and bounces low and breaks all the time and is expensive and thankfully we will hopefully be rid of those.
      Thanks for taking your time in explaining this to me baal. I bet there were boffins within ITTF who calculated and new exactly what they were doing when bringing in the plastic ball!

    25. The Following User Likes TTHopeful's Post:

      ttmonster (05-25-2017)

    Tags for this Thread

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  
    Log in or Register
    BACK TO TOP