On the other hand - as I read all this about Liu Guoliang,. . is it like - the answer for question:
- Why are the chinese best?
Should not be, that they train so hard, the system is that good, the aproach etc etc..
The answer should just be: Because they have Liu Guoliang .. right?
Well, the CNT still have the best and most systematic training regimen.
They start training players at a younger age.
The scout talent earlier.
But perhaps I need to clarify what I was saying about the change in coaching combined with the fact that ML, XX and FZD have not played very much since they withdrew from the China Open in protest of what the government did to the coaching staff of the CNT.
From a technical standpoint, the CNT players are still the best in the world.
1) With some injuries;
2) The quality of training that had been present for years;
3) The new coaching assignments that the top players are not as familiar with; And
4) The fact that CNT top players have not played all that many competitive tournaments since the China Open:
Something is a bit off that has definitely caused ML and, in his last tournament, FZD, to play at a much lower level than we have come to expect.
If you took any one of those things separately, it may not have been such a big deal. Perhaps the shift in coaching staff was the biggest issue. But when you combine all four issues, the CNT has appeared to struggle since June.
The coaches who replaced LGL, I am sure that they are also excellent coaches. But an excellent coach with a different system or philosophy....well, sometimes that will show instant results of a positive nature. But more often, the players need a 6 months to a year to get used to the new coaching.
We’re LGL and the old CNT coaching assignments better for the CNT? Time will tell. Has the new coaching been effective thus far? I have to think that the old coaching staff would have been more successful at helping ML and LGY rise to the occasion in those tight matches.
6 months from now, the new coaching staff may have that under control. But some of this may also have to do with how strong the relationship, the connection, between the top players and their former coaches was.
Was LGL sort of like a surrogate father figure for ML?
Is ML motivated to rise to the occasion for the new coaches? How about other CNT members who protested against the changes? Will the new coaching staff only be fully effective when they have players who were brought up under the new regime in the top slots of the CNT?
We shall see. For now, the only thing we can say for sure is that Timo Boll did beat ML and LGY and regardless of mitigating circumstances, he did a great job standing in there and pulling out those victories.
Sent from The Subterranean Workshop by Telepathy