This user has no status.
Member
I'm thinking about developing players, such as myself, who want to improve their game by taking the initiative and attacking long balls (or flicking short serves) more consistently. I think it's common to see players of beginner or maybe intermediate level who waste opportunities to attack a long ball by pushing the ball all the time. I also remember a post from someone that for a beginner flicking a serve is often high risk/low reward, and for me that seems to be the case.
My club's coach is often scolding me (though much less than before) and other players for pushing easy long balls. Or sometimes I'm playing against someone else better than me and after the match they give the advice (with good intention, of course) to "be more patient and not attack so much, you are only losing points by doing this, etc". Last week I was going to a tournament and one of the club members who was going with me gave me the same advice of trying to push more and attack less, which is probably not a bad advice for me IF my focus is only winning.
I was reading this blog and one of the comments got my attention: "I guess the reason why young players tend do be passive is that they want to win, and at the lower levels it is way easier to win by being safe and letting the opponent to make mistakes rather than to force them. The path of becoming an assertive offensive player is very long and frustrating. Before getting any advantage from holding the initiative, one will have to lose enormous times to players that just let the opponent drown by themselves."
My point is, as a developing player, should you take every opportunity even if this will make you lose a lot of games just by unforced errors? Just set on stone that you are gonna try to take the initiative and attack as much as possible even if this mean losing tons of games 0-3? If that's the case should you also try to keep this mindset in competition? I want to hear you guys input on this matter.
From the blog:
"Before playing the World Championships in 2016, US National Team member Adam Hugh gave me a priceless piece of information - in a WTTC you will not be given opportunities, you need to work hard to create each chance, and when you do you need to make sure you take it."
My club's coach is often scolding me (though much less than before) and other players for pushing easy long balls. Or sometimes I'm playing against someone else better than me and after the match they give the advice (with good intention, of course) to "be more patient and not attack so much, you are only losing points by doing this, etc". Last week I was going to a tournament and one of the club members who was going with me gave me the same advice of trying to push more and attack less, which is probably not a bad advice for me IF my focus is only winning.
I was reading this blog and one of the comments got my attention: "I guess the reason why young players tend do be passive is that they want to win, and at the lower levels it is way easier to win by being safe and letting the opponent to make mistakes rather than to force them. The path of becoming an assertive offensive player is very long and frustrating. Before getting any advantage from holding the initiative, one will have to lose enormous times to players that just let the opponent drown by themselves."
My point is, as a developing player, should you take every opportunity even if this will make you lose a lot of games just by unforced errors? Just set on stone that you are gonna try to take the initiative and attack as much as possible even if this mean losing tons of games 0-3? If that's the case should you also try to keep this mindset in competition? I want to hear you guys input on this matter.
From the blog:
"Before playing the World Championships in 2016, US National Team member Adam Hugh gave me a priceless piece of information - in a WTTC you will not be given opportunities, you need to work hard to create each chance, and when you do you need to make sure you take it."