Most of the people here are yousing USATT ranking system. But ranking system is quite different in different countries. Could someone give me a link to several videos of USATT 2100-2200 players.
Thanks.
Thanks.
He was playing a much higher rating opponent. His rating is close to 2000.
I don't know how the US and Swedish ranking systems compare. It is like apple and orange in my opinion.
Kanak Jha ranking is ~2700 in US ranking system but recently he beat Wong Chun Ting!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL-XK26eH4I
...
My point - the USATT ranking is an extremely bad way of measuring players as the average standard is quite poor and you also seem rank your kids/youths as is not the case in most other countries.
...
My point - the USATT ranking is an extremely bad way of measuring players as the average standard is quite poor and you also seem rank your kids/youths as is not the case in most other countries.
I still argue that USATT rating points are useless to use a comparison in this forum as at least > 50% are from outside of the US (from countries with a higher standard).
Division or class system suffers the same problem, so long as the points never expire. HKTTA uses the division system and people could camp on their points forever, as long as they pay their membership fees. That's why HKTTA started reforming the ranking system similar to the ITTF, where the points accrued "depreciate" over time.
The same can be said for USATT rating where people sandbag just to win in U1200 for the bragging rights.
This is a problem even for the division system, we have former Division A players playing in Division E. So tell me about it.