1. You used the ratings of revspin? Do you know how inaccurate the ratings there?
2. I would like to know the 100'ish tests you made. Please show us.
3. Why are you using the arguement of players sponsored by other brands who have already been using ESN rubbers ever since? Why in the world would Vladi use a Stiga rubber?
4. Did you take into account that the DNA rubbers were released this year?
5. Going back to revspin ratings, T05 has 9.3 spin rating while MXP 50 has 9.6???[/QUOTE]
1. That was just a hint of the actual result off course, with the revspin. BUT when a product has been rated a certain times it use to level out and get a somewhat decent result.
Funny that you compain so much hate for a site you self has written so many reviews on!
:
https://revspin.net/search.php?q=yo...539171:iw77jjhz7fq&cof=FORID:10&ie=ISO-8859-1
2. In the beginning the tests were made little like Dans tests, but more topspin and spin-focused, loops, and much service. Lots of players have tested the rubbers, some of them, on very high class, but the players were taken from alot of classes, during about a month. Not even every day, but I had a book stored, where comments was implemented what the players think and so on. All rubbers was tested on 3 blades,writing it all down. It started to become really interesting when a while ago we had access to the same, but now much better 2009 test that was done in WC that is pretty easy to do now 10 years later with cameras that measures rpm. alas
using a high-speed video camera (1000 fps) for calculation of the rotation speed. https://www.researchgate.net/public...delivered_by_world-class_table_tennis_players
By the way, the blades were Stiga Rosewood NCT V, Nittaku Septear Lead, and DHS TG-7 CP 2 (China National Team, Ebenholz. Like Stigas Ebenholz, but thinner)
Now there are much better equipment to do this. You can borrow or buy or rent very cheap. And to
To record yourself, and compare later on, is rather funny.
Anyway, the total result became in that order i put up:
MX-P 50
Omega 7 Tour Rasanter r53 (which during the test got me to buy one myself, so i bought not the "best" myself.)
Rhyzer Pro 50
DNA H
Now the rest of the 50+ rubbers have to be tested... has to be tested while we can do it this way. Got to ask my sponsor
4. Why should i? What does that matter? So did some of the others.
5.Butterfly is not so big as it was. I play with Nittaku Fastarc G1, which is the best selling rubber in Asia, and best selling rubber on Tabletennis11. Tibhar became the greatest TT-company in Europe for 2 months ago. Its like its only the sponsored players that play wuth their stuff (of cource not, but take a peek at this offifial list:
http://world-tt.com/ps_goods/goods_ranking.php# choose rubbers: T05 on 5 th place
http://world-tt.com/ps_goods/goods_ranking.php# choose blades 6 of 10 is Butterfly 3 Nittaku 1 TSP in top.
5. There are MANY players i know of that thinks MX-P has better spin than T05.
Me too, in certain shoots. But T05 probarbly is spinnier in total.
But as a rubber if i was forced to choose, i have chosen MXP (or MX-S) Did you take in account that T05 has like 11-12 years on the shoulders. Amazing indeed! BUT Pretty much has happened since then in the TT-science world, and very good rubbers have come out.
Peace out. The results, in rpm will be published when ive done the other rubbers too.