I question I have is what can you do with any of the rubbers above that you can't do with the other rubbers?
Say I'm 5 meters behind the table and have to hit the ball very hard than the perpendicular (COR, speed of the rubber) and/or tangential parameter (speed and spin potential) 1) of one rubber might be to low 2) to get the ball back on the table. Or try to play a counter loop where your racket has to be nearly parallel to the floor on impact with two identical rubbers except for their topsheet grip and so on.
@Michael, you really need to worry less about the rubber and boosting and more on you you play.
Can you define "offensive potential" for us?
@
Oscarting rubbers do not have accuracy. People have control or better, consistency.
Is that so? Rubbers and blades don't have accuracy, yes, but they can reduce precision because of e.g. non-uniform materials, process variations and because of their construction (e.g. think of a pimples-in rubber which has either or both say rectangular shaped pimples vs round ones or where the pimple shape varies every couple of millimeters or which has sparsely and densely pimpled areas). Since we are humans with limited repeatability these variations can lead to a lower overall accuracy of our shots.
How would I describe e.g. such a rubber? Maybe as uncontrollable...
Also, can you define throw angle? Better yet, can you define what causes throw angle?
It is amazing how people claim to be able to tell the difference of a few micro seconds.
Quite simple: Get someone to feed you multi-ball. Execute the same stroke and see how much clearance over the net your shots will have. You could also setup some high-speed cameras and measure angles between the incoming and outgoing ball and the racket...
1) Tiefenbacher and Durey, 1994
https://sasportssience.blob.core.wi...iles/IJTTS_2_1_14_Tiefenbacher_The Impact.pdf
2) in general the higher the impact velocity the lower these parameters