-
says Verified Cheater, Banned by ITTF :)says Verified Cheater, Banned by ITTF :)
-
This user has no status.This user has no status.1 Week Ago 1659947211 #42
-
1 Week Ago 1660006631 #43
my exact thoughts as well.
CNT men's team superiority over all other teams will be in question once XX and ML retire
FZD alone will be uncontested in singles but will have to hold the line with the likes of LGY, LJK and WCQ against international teams - while LJK and WCQ are great, they still have issues with winning consistency against foreign players
-
This user has no status.This user has no status.1 Week Ago 1660011463 #44
There is no quota.
Look at how many Japanese of Taiwanese players they sponsor.
I'm taking a wild guess, but I would easily say the ratio is 5-10 to 1, 1 being the combined sponsored of all other brands. so if each brand sponsored 1 player, and that equates to say 20 or 30 players, Butterfly is 100 to 200 players, across all age groups.
TTT
-
This user has no status.This user has no status.1 Week Ago 1660011626 #45
Things haven't changed for 5-10 years for LGY.
Its not just his lost, but how he lost.
But that is the reality when your colleagues can replace you in work in any trade across the world.
Nonperforming, gets replaces/retrenched - unless your boss has no one better to replace you (which sums up most of the 200 playing countries in the world)
TTT
-
This user has no status.This user has no status.1 Week Ago 1660011798 #46
LGY is 27, LJK is 26.
WCQ is 22
FZD is 25
at the moment LJK still looks like an olympic candidate, but LGY is pretty much out of the equation. His BMT just doesn't exist and too much of a risk.
Seems like 2 singles will be FZD and WCQ.
Teams event, maybe ML will still play, with LJK and 1 another junior.
Weather ML can still play singles, remain to be seenTTT
-
says May the Spin be with you!says May the Spin be with you!1 Week Ago 1660012691 #47
-
This user has no status.This user has no status.1 Week Ago 1660028122 #48
Consumers paying for costs of marketing (expenses) of companies is pretty standard across the board in all industries.
So to answer you, then yes. that is the case.
Many brands doesn't do marketing, and should/are normally cheaper due to lower overheads.
Some brands are terrible in marketing
In terms of Butterfly, they make a Tenergy, and can make money off it for 10-15 years
for other brands, 3 years tops, then it is replaced with maybe 1 or 2 more models (seems like new models out every year)Last edited by Tony's Table Tennis; 1 Week Ago at 06:56 AM.
TTT
-
This user has no status.This user has no status.1 Week Ago 1660028487 #49
I wish Butterfly was a public company. I wonder what kind of insane margins they make.
-
This user has no status.This user has no status.