This user has no status.
it doesn't really matter which rubber you use as long as it suites your style. rubber doesn't win games for the players.
Oppsss.. you're not from China. Sorry bout that.From FB, you're Chinese. My mistake.
I'm not running away cos 5pm local time... I need to go.
I "guess" China did not allow other to use DHS H3 at all because I guess the rubber has some advantages over other rubbers( my personal opinion )
and the fact that China cannot lose to foreigners.
Just add a note, saying someone chinese from china sometime is and insult >.>
Fyi, china has been listed out why european still far begin, except dima and timo. Few years back, timo is the only one who can consistently put up the same level at any time. But many European players unable to do it. However, 99% of CNT can consistently do this. This is the main gap
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
You better ask your own country. CHINA.
Are those rubbers available to public or pro? Come on Tony.
Enjoy weeken ya. bye
I am Chinese, but not all Chinese are from China, unless you are talking about ethnic Chinese are all from China? Include all the Malay Chinese is from China too.... any ways, you are making too much assumptions
CNT, DHS, China is not keeping "special" H3 a secret. Non CNT players are using it.
If this secret is the key for CNT TT success, then why didn't any national federation or ITTF step in and make the playing field fairer?
Then why foreign companies didn't go and copy the secret forumla (since every country is spying on each other, or simply you can just take final product and study it)
My personal opnion, you have some serious obsesity with China, the CNT, and the Chinese players using H3
I wonder if you have the same obsesity with non CNT members using H3, BS H3 or any other national H3....
To prove you are thinking logically, all you need to do is answer this (yes, 3rd time I'm asking you) - when you are free:
If these super spinny H3 rubbers are so good, then why are they only good during some time and not all the time?
Why the same rubbers by other top players (world top 20) can't beat your Tenergy players (Dima/Timo)?
And if these rubbers are so good, why are the Germans/European/Japanese/Korean/Taiwanese so stupid and choose the inferrior Tenergy and didn't go for Hurricane?
Why so many CNT A and B team members didn't go for H3 on the Forehand? why did they go for inferrior product?
Spot on
There are times the non Chinese can beat the Chinese, but that really requires them to play above par, and maybe the Chinese to play below par
But that isn't happening enough, as Chinese is just far more consistance and they also have a number to back that.
This years WTTTC, besides a weaker number 3 from Germany, the 1 and 2 is the strongest they have ever had. But there is still a gap as both sides play par or above par, the gap with the Chinese is just slightly higher and as we say, ZJK was out, but Ma long was there to hold the fort. XX at number 3, point is also a given.
If it is equipment, special rubber, special blade, etc, non Chinese are not stupid, they will then have Butterfly, Stiga or other companies to make even better products. But for high level players, table tennis is way beyond just equipment
Just to say here. Pro versions on Tenergy in available from some sources. They cost nearly 120 USD. But i'm not sure they are the heaviest.Between National H3 - a general public can get (not talking about player's version) - if he/she is willing to pay for it. The special Timo Boll T05 - I don't think general public can get....
Just to say here. Pro versions on Tenergy in available from some sources. They cost nearly 120 USD. But i'm not sure they are the heaviest.
In the days of the first sponge rubbers - yes equipment was an advantage
In the days of the first speed glue player - yes equipment was an advantage
The advantage was there and caused a huge domination.
In those days, TT was a hard bat.
Equipment did play a big role, and it isn't easy to change equipment and still to master the sport - ask WLQ and Ma Lin who became "weaker" players after speed glue ban. LGL simply just couldn't play with other SP since the rule changes during his time - hence he retired very young. Now these are 3 world champion that cannot change due to change of equipment.
But today, only 80% of CNT uses H3 or TG3 national on forehand. Some players uses Tibhar GripS and other tacky rubber.
Yes these are specially prepared - in terms of sponge hardness, size and version. The quality control is better than commerical - but it is not a secret - the more generic one is available to the public through many sources. Same with Butterfly, as Butterfly sponsored players do not use normal commericial version. They get ones that doesn't come in the normal retail packaging and the quality is also greater too! Timo also get the heaviest T05 that Butterfly can make!
Between National H3 - a general public can get (not talking about player's version) - if he/she is willing to pay for it. The special Timo Boll T05 - I don't think general public can get....
The truth is today's equpment is all so advance. Every body is copying from every body. In fact sponge is majority from ESN. In fact H3 even used Tenergy sponge before, but that didn't work out for very long. (Note any top sheet can go with any sponge)
But it doesn't mean equipment is the dominating factor today, compared to the days of speed glue vs non speed glue, or sponge vs non sponge. The comparison is totally different.
Today, you have CNT, HKG, SIN and many European/American based players using national or provincial version H3, and they still can't beat your top Tenergy players. But then you can get a soso sponge player and he can beat the best "hard bat" player. This is just an example on how out your equipment with yester years is with today.
Today Dima and Timo are on par with Top Chinese, and are better than over 15 to 20 of CNT A team players is because they are talented and training more than other non Chinese players. The culture, structure etc made it all happen - even with less money compared to CNT structure. This proves that it isn't impossible to make another Waldner, or Timo, it is difficult but not impossible. So the question isn't about equpment but rather how they got Waldner, Timo in the first place, and how can you times that solution by 10 and make a bigger force to challenge CNT and other Asian countries.
There are many CNT players who use your super rubber, and could not make it, it is because they are not better in terms of table tennis skills, and no matter what super rubber they use, they won't make the cut and to challenge Dima and Timo.
Yes, equipment is important, but it is how you use the equipment that counts more.
It is not sponge vs hard bat days any more.....
I'm totally understand what you trying to tell me,honestly. Just player like Ma Long or ZJK, can beat Timo/Dima with with lil bit help
from the rubbers as what I suggest (not outside top 10). Period.
I'm totally understand what you trying to tell me,honestly. Just player like Ma Long or ZJK, can beat Timo/Dima with with lil bit help
from the rubbers as what I suggest (not outside top 10). Period.
Finally!!!!
I would love to hear more about how Para train in China. Their methods are successful - esp. since they got the Olympics & Paralympics in 2008. Look at their Class Singles results in the last 3 Paralympic Games (players are classified so that one plays against similarly abled players):
I'm actually wondering, how does Para players train, I haven't been following Para, only abled body
I heard something about 1 to 2 or 3 practice partner per Para player in China
Other than that, do you know how top Para players train?
I would love to hear more about how Para train in China. Their methods are successful - esp. since they got the Olympics & Paralympics in 2008. Look at their Class Singles results in the last 3 Paralympic Games (players are classified so that one plays against similarly abled players):
ATHENS 2004 M: 1 Gold (M4) 1 Silver (M9) 1 Bronze (M10)
ATHENS 2004 W: 3 Gold (F5, F6-8, F9) 2 Silver (F5, F9) 1 Bronze (F10)
BEIJING 2008 M: 3 Gold (M3, M8, M9-10) 2 Silver (M7, M9-10)
BEIJING 2008 W: 5 Gold (F1-2, F3, F4, F5, F9) 3 Silver (F5, F9, F10) 2 Bronze (F9, F10)
LONDON 2012 M: 3 Gold (M3, M8, M9) 3 Silver (M4, M5, M10)
LONDON 2012 F: 5 Gold (F1-2, F4, F5, F8, F9) 2 Silver (F5, F10) 2 Bronze (F9, F10)
Tony I wil send you a PM in this regard.