This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
The spin is not identical. But if you even pretend it is, the stroke size from LJK is not the same. But the spin is not identical.
Probably most people watching TT know this already, slowmotion on youtube is essential for trying to figure out what is going on. It does not always help, but you may pause the video with space and go backward/forward frame by frame with , and . (comma and period) on the keyboard.
Last edited:
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
Basics of good service- same movement but different types of contacts during ball impact gives variations of spin.
Was it because Liang went down the net, so you think that was backspin? 
The camera's angle let us see Ma's motion clearly, although it was fast. It seems that Ma seldom serves a ball like this with back spin. Personally, I think it was the same as the first one.
How about the 2nd question? Even if it had been back spin, why would Liang have not done the same?
The camera's angle let us see Ma's motion clearly, although it was fast. It seems that Ma seldom serves a ball like this with back spin. Personally, I think it was the same as the first one.
How about the 2nd question? Even if it had been back spin, why would Liang have not done the same?
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
Was it because Liang went down the net, so you think that was backspin?
The camera's angle let us see Ma's motion clearly, although it was fast. It seems that Ma seldom serves a ball like this with back spin. Personally, I think it was the same as the first one.
How about the 2nd question? Even if it had been back spin, why would Liang have not done the same?
Look at the complete swing motion on the serve. On the second one Ma Long comes more under the ball.
This user has no status.
Member
Well, Mizutani says ML is the best at serving because it's very difficult to read his spin as he uses near identical motions for every serve with a different spin.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
Even so, why Liang did not do the same?
Well if you are standing where he is, you see something different. The other thing to remember is that Liang has watched and played Ma Long many times so there are cues he is looking for. It is quite possible that something Ka Long did to setup the serve threw him off. Match play in terms of reading what the opponent is going to do requires you to know how they think.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
He didn't expect to get the same serve again, or maybe wanted to open with a bh flip.
Even so, why Liang did not do the same?
This user has no status.
Member
I think a lot of table tennis is about making a tactical choice, then pulling it off if the conditions are favorable. For the first one, Liang might have been thinking about taking a long serve into the backhand with the forehand, and it paid off. He might have tactically been thinking of doing something else the second time. He probably wasn't expecting Ma Long to do 2 in a row, especially after he completely shut the first one down.
There are many possibilities, tactics is one of them eg. how you want to play the next couple of balls. If you pause and watch the first serve closely, at 2:16 - already when the ball is falling down Liang is pivoting around to play a forehand from his backhand side. He made a decision before the serve was completely executed. Maybe he read an early cue and was able to play a more powerful shot, maybe tactics or possibly just took a chance that paid off. Whatever you do, you want to be as unpredictable as possible. Easy to say though, quite hard in reality.Even so, why Liang did not do the same?
It's quite beyond my expectation.
Personally, I think Ma's serving is the weakest comparing with his other skills. I'll say FH looping is his best. I think alike with Wister's. Below is what I think personally.
(I know some buddies think the 2nd serve was a back spin. Please don't mind. Welcome to share what you think!)
The 1st serve: Liang's judge was good, so he made a nice return. Few people can do this to Ma.
The 2nd serve: Ma judged Liang didn't dare to do the same, so he served the same again. This time Ma was right, so he got a completely different result.
What we can learn and use: As buddies have pointed out already, especially on serving and receiving, it's half predicting and half guessing. The same serve (or similar) can have completely different results. Other than skills, thinking more about the opponent is important.
Last edited:
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
It's very hard to win points on the serve outright. What they try to create with the serve is an advantage to get a weak return to kill. As a receiver the hard part is to calculate the amount of spin.
It's quite beyond my expectation.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
Similar threads
