blade from chinese national team player ( ma long , zhang jike, yan an, li xiaoxia )

[panany]

hello my friend ( player in last national game chinese ) get somes blade from national team player li xiaoxia, ma long , and Zhang jike )


1000$








i just help my friend for sell, i already know price expensive ^^

 

[yogi_bear]

Are those really their blades or they are just autographed by those players? It would be hard to prove that cnt players owned them before.

 

[RidTheKid]

Ma Long uses a 2018 version of W968. ZJK uses the old silver tag Viscaria from the JKL-series.

 

[panany]

Ma Long uses a 2018 version of W968. ZJK uses the old silver tag Viscaria from the JKL-series.

U think ma long use only 1 blade ? ^^

 

[panany]

By exemple 1 of my Friend know zjk

And zjk talk, for 1 Season he useds 5 blades minimum...

1 for training
1 for multiball
1 for open
1 for Big compétions
And 1 Always like 2nd racket for compétition...

 

[yogi_bear]

Proof of ownership or Chen Meng is my secret gf

 

[RidTheKid]

Ma Long has used the 2018 version this entire year, why would he suddenly shift to a 2017 version with different dimensions?

Still, ZJK uses the Viscaria with the old Butterfly lens and old silver tag. Go watch all his practice videos.

Anyone can buy a Viscaria and get it signed and try to sell it for $1000. Everything you've presented so far points towards it being so. If that's wrong you will provide proof.

By exemple 1 of my Friend know zjk

And zjk talk, for 1 Season he useds 5 blades minimum...

1 for training
1 for multiball
1 for open
1 for Big compétions
And 1 Always like 2nd racket for compétition...

 

[UpSideDownCarl]

These blades all look new. So, why are people asking if the players owned them? Even if they owned them, they did not use them.

You guys are silly. The question is, would you spend $1,000.00 for an autograph. And that is up to each of you separately. Think of these as collector's items. Do you want them or no? If no, move on.

I moved on before I saw the price. I want Waldner's blade that he played WTTC in 1997. Nothing else will do.

 

[Shifu]

These blades all look new. So, why are people asking if the players owned them? Even if they owned them, they did not use them.

You guys are silly. The question is, would you spend $1,000.00 for an autograph. And that is up to each of you separately. Think of these as collector's items. Do you want them or no? If no, move on.

I moved on before I saw the price. I want Waldner's blade that he played WTTC in 1997. Nothing else will do.

Or Olympics 2004 =)

 

[langel]

Well, I don't think that $1000 for 4 blades is too much. I think its a very reasonable price for 4 blades.

 

[RidTheKid]

Yes if that's so, I thought the price was $1000 for each.

Well, I don't think that $1000 for 4 blades is too much. I think its a very reasonable price for 4 blades.

 

[yogi_bear]

the OP claims that these blades were owned by the said players, are you saying it is silly to ask for proof of ownership Carl? The autographs may be legit but to claim it was own by such players without proof is questionable.

 

[Ioiettino]

Not to mention that there are harder things to counterfeit than an autograph. Either way, if "my friend says..." is the only selling argument, should these even remain listed?

 

[yogi_bear]

The ma long signature looks like it was slowly written.

 

[panany]

in france at start lot of people talk like u, but after they know me and know wish player i know .. and why i know player they stop talk...

 

[UpSideDownCarl]

the OP claims that these blades were owned by the said players, are you saying it is silly to ask for proof of ownership Carl? The autographs may be legit but to claim it was own by such players without proof is questionable.

Since I am a moderator, I will not say what I actually think.

But, if someone wants to buy a bridge, I am selling this nice bridge in Brooklyn.

I think you can do the math. Can Panany prove that they were owned by the player's? I have to be honest: I don't think it matters. We know the players who signed each blade did not play with the blades. Nobody played with them. So, if the player owned them to sell them, it says nothing of value anyway. If Ma Long owned a Yinhe Galaxy 896 blade and signed it, but never played the blade, and therefore IT WAS NEVER REALLY HIS BLADE, I don't think the situation would be any different.

Now, knowing that, if someone wanted to buy the autograph, I am not going to say my opinion on whether they should as long as they know what I already said.

 

[panany]

Since I am a moderator, I will not say what I actually think.

But, if someone wants to buy a bridge, I am selling this nice bridge in Brooklyn.

I think you can do the math. Can Panany prove that they were owned by the player's? I have to be honest: I don't think it matters. We know the players who signed each blade did not play with the blades. Nobody played with them. So, if the player owned them to sell them, it says nothing of value anyway. If Ma Long owned a Yinhe Galaxy 896 blade and signed it, but never played the blade, and therefore IT WAS NEVER REALLY HIS BLADE, I don't think the situation would be any different.

Now, knowing that, if someone wanted to buy the autograph, I am not going to say my opinion on whether they should as long as they know what I already said.

problem u know anybody change what they talk ... on my other topic i send 1 blade w968 lot of people say : blade not very good because low number is better ... but very hard get... because only very strong player can get ...

now my friend get by few player blade with very low numbers... and all says : no is not ma long ( or other player ) give blade from his bag... ^^.


sorry for my english

 

[yogi_bear]

Proof is everything for those who will be spending 1000usd for those blades. For people here who are collectors of blades, it would be a bad investment if they buy it and then sell them in the future without proof of ownership.

Since I am a moderator, I will not say what I actually think.

But, if someone wants to buy a bridge, I am selling this nice bridge in Brooklyn.

I think you can do the math. Can Panany prove that they were owned by the player's? I have to be honest: I don't think it matters. We know the players who signed each blade did not play with the blades. Nobody played with them. So, if the player owned them to sell them, it says nothing of value anyway. If Ma Long owned a Yinhe Galaxy 896 blade and signed it, but never played the blade, and therefore IT WAS NEVER REALLY HIS BLADE, I don't think the situation would be any different.

Now, knowing that, if someone wanted to buy the autograph, I am not going to say my opinion on whether they should as long as they know what I already said.

 

[UpSideDownCarl]

Proof is everything for those who will be spending 1000usd for those blades. For people here who are collectors of blades, it would be a bad investment if they buy it and then sell them in the future without proof of ownership.

Yogi, are you actually saying that, if the blade is not the actual model the player used but it can be proved the player “owned” the blade, that it would somehow be worth more?

So a Yinhe 896 blade with ML’s signature and “Proof of Ownership”, would somehow have more value than an 896 with ML’s signature and no proof of ownership?

This seems very silly to me.


Sent from The Subterranean Workshop by Telepathy

 

[Brs]

These blades all look new. So, why are people asking if the players owned them? Even if they owned them, they did not use them.

You guys are silly. The question is, would you spend $1,000.00 for an autograph. And that is up to each of you separately. Think of these as collector's items. Do you want them or no? If no, move on.

I moved on before I saw the price. I want Waldner's blade that he played WTTC in 1997. Nothing else will do.

By coincidence I have Waldner's 1997 blade. I will sell it to you for (Dr. Evil voice) One million dollars. What? Wait wait. I meant One Billion dollars. Paypal gift only please.