This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
When we talk about pros, we normally think of the elites.
But what about if we go to the border line - those that are border pros, like a semi pro or maybe even amateurs.
This is similar in all sports, so not unique to table tennis.
Give you an example - South Africa's rugby national team, they are all pros, they have a high level, and they earn good money playing the sport. Taiwan's rugby national team is considered amateurs, despite, they are national team and play internationally - they all have full time jobs.
Same with basketball, South Africa's basketball is considered amateurs when compared to those from European teams - both in terms of level and income.
Most "amateur" national team sports, do not earn income playing the sport, and would need some sponsor/donation or to get a full time/part time job to get the sport going or even self fund.
Case study for consideration - who is the pro and who is not:
A player in 3rd bundesliga in Germany, plays table tennis full time, is a decent high level, has not play international, but earns income playing table tennis.
Compared to a South African national player or New Zealand national player, that play some internationals (in Africa or Oceania, or commonwealth games etc) but does not earn any income for playing. At most, only earning tournament prize monies - but most of the time, the prize money is not even close to the minimal income bracket.
So how would you define a table tennis pro, that are not of those elites we know of?
A) some one who plays internationally?
B) some one who has played in the Olympics?
C) some one who is are very high level (note, playing at the olympics does not mean you are automatically a high level)?
D) some one who makes an income playing the sport (salary)?
I am not sure if there is a E or F, but please do add on if you feel there should be more to the above 4.
and then of those, which do you think is a fair definition of a "pro" in your own view.
But what about if we go to the border line - those that are border pros, like a semi pro or maybe even amateurs.
This is similar in all sports, so not unique to table tennis.
Give you an example - South Africa's rugby national team, they are all pros, they have a high level, and they earn good money playing the sport. Taiwan's rugby national team is considered amateurs, despite, they are national team and play internationally - they all have full time jobs.
Same with basketball, South Africa's basketball is considered amateurs when compared to those from European teams - both in terms of level and income.
Most "amateur" national team sports, do not earn income playing the sport, and would need some sponsor/donation or to get a full time/part time job to get the sport going or even self fund.
Case study for consideration - who is the pro and who is not:
A player in 3rd bundesliga in Germany, plays table tennis full time, is a decent high level, has not play international, but earns income playing table tennis.
Compared to a South African national player or New Zealand national player, that play some internationals (in Africa or Oceania, or commonwealth games etc) but does not earn any income for playing. At most, only earning tournament prize monies - but most of the time, the prize money is not even close to the minimal income bracket.
So how would you define a table tennis pro, that are not of those elites we know of?
A) some one who plays internationally?
B) some one who has played in the Olympics?
C) some one who is are very high level (note, playing at the olympics does not mean you are automatically a high level)?
D) some one who makes an income playing the sport (salary)?
I am not sure if there is a E or F, but please do add on if you feel there should be more to the above 4.
and then of those, which do you think is a fair definition of a "pro" in your own view.