I don't know about others, but whenever I start thinking a faster blade would be a good idea I take a long hard look at my touch game first. Only when absolutely certain there's sufficient leeway there to sacrifice a little control I start to look at the high end, and see what could be gained speedwise when hitting all-out.
So far, I've been backing out after trying outer composite blades. I do feel absolute control with them when playing power, but have also experienced a loss in the more delicate aspects of the game. Inner composite seems fine, but whenever pressed by an opponent in the short game I renew my deeply critical reflection. It's all tradeoffs, of course, and whatever floats your boat.
I 100% agree. I am looking for the right balance between risk and reward. The good thing is that the website, ttgearlab.com, does some interesting testing that I am using to think through my blade choices. I am also learning what I like in the inner plies which I never took seriously (ayous, limba) and am not as much a fan of say (kiri, hinoki).
The 145 seems to be at the upper limit of the speed I like and it feels very much like a Butterfly wood blade when I loop hard and my touch is not compromised with it, though it clearly needs some work compared to say a Korbel, but it is in the same range feeling wise. The Mazunov is just the last experiment to push the upper bounds of speed. It is a 94g Mazunov that a friend gave me as a gift, so it is much lighter than most. I just couldn't stand the handle when using it to play with rubbers as the head size usually means extra weight and the handle was just too thick for me to hold it. Given its lower weight, it probably plays slower than most Mazunov's would, and the Mazunov is not ridiculously fast for the modern age.
And if all these fail, I can always go back to the Hadraw. But with the Hadraw, I am not going to beat anyone I couldn't beat already. The Carbonado X45 series are an interesting set of blades worth trying if you want something different - I don't think they fit cleanly into the inner vs outer carbon category because of their design (they are nominally outer carbon blades) and they are all looping biased.