Was Dima very bad today? or was ML playing very well?
As I wrote before - it is all about serve receive. ma long served all to dimas FH and Dima pushed it high or his flick was to weak and easy to counter.That's what i'm trying to work out. I generally think Ma Long just doesn't let Dima play. He plays so tactically well whilst being incredibly shot efficient and making no unforced errors!
As I wrote before - it is all about serve receive. ma long served all to dimas FH and Dima pushed it high or his flick was to weak and easy to counter.
GO JUN!!!!
Ma Long has decimated Ovtcharov on many occasions. The only really close encounter they had was at the 2009 Danish open which was full 7 sets. In their last 7 matches Ovtcharov has only accumulated 3 sets. I can't see Ovtcharov beating Ma Long in his career the way things currently go.
I think just the opposite.. For me Ma Long looks way stronger on this tournament..Ma Long has no chance of beating FZD - pushes too much....
(that should get someone riled up and something started... tee hee hee)
I think just the opposite.. For me Ma Long looks way stronger on this tournament..
its still part of the point so its not a let. thats just the rulesthe umpire during jun vs fzd is a retard... The ball broke in the middle of rally and he didn't call a let
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
its still part of the point so its not a let. thats just the rules
dont think they specifically state it anywhere but the ball is technically still in play even if it breaks upon impact hence still being part of the rally therefore section 2.09.02.04 cant really apply cos thats when the playing conditions are impactedoh really? I didnt know that?can you tell me which point on ITTF handbook?
the umpire during jun vs fzd is a retard... The ball broke in the middle of rally and he didn't call a let
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
2.09.02.04 | because the conditions of play are disturbed in a way which could affect the outcome of the rally. |