Reviews by leevittha

Sticky and spinny topsheet with red sponge.Abit mushy for my liking.Average speed and power.Personally i would prefer dhs tinarc series/euro or japanese rubber for 40+ plastic ball but this rubber is recommended for backhand by some of the chinese table tennis magazines.
Speed
6.4
Spin
6.5
Durability
8.6
Control
8.3
Above average power and speed. TG 7 blade is marginally better in terms of quality control and consistency. I prefer chinese rubber setup e.g. hurricane neo or sword palladin for this blade.Affordable setup for offensive beginners.
Speed
5.8
Control
6
Hardness
5.5
Durability
6.3
I have tried both this and stiga clipper cr blades.I am using fl version.Personally i prefer this blade over clipper cr for 40+ plastic ball offensive looping game.Both are all wood blades but samsonov pro is slightly more bouncier and more powerful loop and drives can be executed off table.Dwell time is above average.Most of my opponents would think I am using carbon blade during rallies.However in table control is slightly lacking as compared to clipper cr. My current setup with stiga calibra tour h backhand and nittaku fastarc g1 forehand.Highly recommended for offensive players.
Speed
6.8
Control
6.4
Hardness
5.4
Durability
6.5
Highly recommended.Great for attacking games e.g. looping and driving and serves.
Speed
6.8
Spin
7.6
Durability
6.6
Control
7.3
Personally i like it better than my acuda s1 on the forehand.firmer,spinnier and faster than acuda s1.Control is above average. Good for both looping and drive rallies.
Speed
6.9
Spin
7.6
Durability
5
Control
7.1
Spinny but non-tacky grippy topsheet with white sponge.Sponge is slightly softer and slightly more dwell time than tibhar aurus.Tibhar aurus is faster and bouncier. Feel free to comment.
Speed
6.5
Spin
6.8
Durability
5.8
Control
6.3
Above average in terms of speed spin and control.Slight lacking in power off table compared to some of the arylate carbon blades.I pair it with joola explode rubber and xiom omega iv.Smooth surface makes it easier for rubber removal.
Speed
6
Control
5.5
Hardness
6.2
Durability
6.5
I have tried both clipper cr and clipper wood.Speed is medium fast.Cr version is slightly faster and easier for rubber removal.The 7 ply wood construction adds stability to your shot.Sweet spot is average.Nice pair with dhs hurricane neo or other chinese rubbers but requires chinese looping styles.I have tried the cr version with scylla long pimples as well. Nothing impressive but rather controllable for a wooden blade.I think japanese player ishikawa had used it for quite some time before switching to current blade.
Speed
5.5
Control
8.3
Hardness
6.1
Durability
6.8
One of the best blade i have ever used.Premium craftsmanship and quality.Medium fast but superb spin and control.I pair it with andro rasant turbo both sides.Highly recommended.
Speed
6.2
Control
8.9
Hardness
6.2
Durability
5.9
I have been using this for about 1year.Feeling is rather medium hard.Slighty softer feel than my timboll zlc.Good control yet powerful loop in middistance table.Dwell time is medium slightly longer than zlc.I have tried chinese rubbers like hurricane neo 3,hurricane nittaku pro but the best combination is with xiom omega v tour.Overall ratings 8/10.Feel free to comment.
Speed
8
Control
7.6
Hardness
5.5
Durability
8.1
Top