Search results

That is true, but my point was that LJK made big progress this year. Normally Ma Long is also better then him, but nonetheless he beat him. He has great wrist and plays very close to the table, when they are playing rallies he usualy looses them.

Definitely it was the pressure. Last month he has beaten FZD.

?Aruna win 11:3

who wins the doubles wins the match. If there is going to decider Zhou Yu is stronger then Fan Fhenpeng

So far FZD playing very poor. Doubles should be crutial. Anyway Liang should beat FZD, but it will be enough to win?

?working fine

Bad? This is just great! Watching same players is boring at some time. Also LJK made a big progres this year beating all his opponents in china league. His playing style is very unique close to the table.

I would spend a lot of money to play Shang Kun level, but it seems you have found cheaper way. With his blade you will be unstopable.

what time is the next semi final?

That must be frustraiting when you loose topspin rallies against defender.

I do not see the poll but Mizutani point against apolonia is my favourite.

I understand your point. EL-P is little bit better for flat hits , active block and counter - that is why I love it. But since I am trying to open the game with first topspin attack EL-S should be more suitable. I will check it out. Thanks again.

thanks this is what I wanted to hear. I forgot there is a new range of evo rubbers, that is why I though about quantum. Since I am quite satisfied with EL-P I will try EL-S. It shouldn't be much different.

that is quite different opinion of what tibhar says: 45 degrees is quite hard, it shoult be harder then EL-P. On polish website I have found that quantum is very spinny, while you say it is more fast the spinny. i think I better stay with EL-P, which is good variation for FH rubber enough spin...

My evo EL-P is getting old and I need to change it soon. I found there is a new rubber from tibhar which is Quantum S, anybody played with it? What are your thoughts?

I bet Zhu Yuling is the numer one

Kaizoku - I understand your point, but this statement cannot be truth: This is why we have judges. because in most cases the players point out about the broken ball or edge of the table, not the judges. Of course later on the judges make decision, anyway it is connected with players points. From...

That may be truth, but it was FZD who pointed out that ball was cracked not the judges. He knew he hit it with the edge, even if the ball wasn't crashed it would never get back to the Dimas side of the table, and even if it did he would easily finished it. FZD knew that and Dima worked so hard...

it is easier to admit when you just get back to the game 2:2 and leading in 5th game. But the 3rd game was crutial and I am sure that Timo Boll would admit the point was over.

?Now who thinks thinks FZD is fair player