Search results

if what you suspect is true and it is just about the weight distribution, you simply go for a cybershape CWT which enables you to add 3g, 6g or 9g weight on the bottom of the handle, which will make your blade less head heavy.

how heavy is your current blade ? I got a stiga cybershape wood CWT with 82g which ends up at 187g with 1.8mm PK50 and 2.1mm Jekyll & Hyde Rubbers on it. A stiga cybershape wood (non-CWT) with 80g ends up at 180g with 2.0mm Victas V>20 Double Extra and 1.8mm Tibhar Evo MX-S. Perhaps it makes...

Victas V>11 is indeed build to be lighter. Another light rubber are the Xiom Omega 7 Euro/Pro. If it is also about the head heaviness and you dont dislike the cybershape form factor, you might try a light selected stiga cybershape (wood) CWT. This enables you to fine tune the head...

If you would like to stay within the 5 ply blades you could get a Nittaku Violin or even an Acoustic. The later should definitely be an upgrade to the Sweden extra and is definitely good for looping and will give you extra speed as well. You host have to check what weight you choose to not get a...

Having a robot myself i wonder a few things. Does this robot really create proper backspin ? The arc of the ball seems pretty even for backspin, but perhaps you only set it to -1 backspin which is Ok, i guess. I think the high ball arc that you setup your robot to produce will not help you with...

That is not true. Rakza Z and many other hybrid rubbers are pretty good for things like flipping and pushing since they offer very little catapult in the short game. You can basically place the ball 5 cm behind the net, due to the hard sponge combined with often sticky surfaces

it has way less catapult.

For the flared/master Handle i measured this: 100x25x35mm (could be 1mm more on width and height of the handle) These are the measurements on the bottom of the handle. The slimmest part of the handle is about 30mm wide.https://imgur.com/a/cKVqTRa Hope that helps.

What dimensions do you want to have? I can try to measure it later. Gesendet von meinem SM-G998B mit Tapatalk

i think in terms of the general weight it could be a wash between the CWT and regular version weight. The regular version has the full wooden handle, while the CWT version without weights has a little hole/gap for the addition weights (which would make it less heavy), but also the magnet...

Isn't it also interesting that one of the best players actually showcases his topspin technique which goes against the general teaching consensus that you should NOT lean back while executing the stroke ? We don't know if this video shows him looping a heavy backspin ball, but nonetheless this...

Ok, i understand. I thought that the Cybershape wood was not in stock yet on retailers that would actually weigh them for customer selection. I actually searched for the CWT version on my list of trusted retailers and none of them had one that they could weigh for me, but in hindsight I...

I don't know what your preference in racket weight is, but not that even an 82g Cybershape wood Cwt with hard rubbers like you want to use will weigh probably >190g. Blade plus 1.8 PK50 & 2.1 J&H V47.5 is currently 187g for me (without any weight inserted) I also wonder how you want to get a...

oh sorry, i must have mistaken you for somebody else. Since the two guys from TT Planet 21 are from italy and posted their reviews here already i figured you with the italian nick name to be one of them :p

That is the wooden Cybershape review... The only other (Cybershape wood) one would be the CWT version which does not really differ that much start from the configurability of the weight Gesendet von meinem SM-G998B mit Tapatalk

I would not conclude anything yet, but regarding the rescue shots where I reach for a ball that is well below the table level the amount of force i can excerpt with the wrist movement is not enough to get it over the net. I hit the lower part of the net post twice today while I am sure I would...

As a first impression of the blade (comparing it to the Xiom HAL) the blade is distinctively slower, thus more controlled over the table. rescue shots that i would reach for and get shoveled over the net with the HAL now simply end up in the net (and not by a small margin). Doing a few loops on...

https://youtu.be/-6ELpI4Nq6k Gesendet von meinem SM-G998B mit Tapatalk

Thank you for this review. Since you reviewed the Stiga Cybershape Wood lately and you stated that the TMXi is pretty controlled in the short game /over the table: can you compare those two blades for the short game and for the close to mid range topspin game ? From reading so far and knowing...

It does have a larger handle than the nittaku regular ones. It seems to be the dimensions like the Donic Applegren WC 89 flared and Xiom TMIXi handle. A bit thicker than the Nittaku Acoustic Special Grip Handle