i showed methodology and pointed out the factors, percentage of US fans who know simon biles vs percentage of china fans who know ML.
what espn methodology?all I see is jibberish fancy talk they describe a formula they dont even show.
I was not certain nor i implied ML is definitely more popular I questioned/doubted ESPN's formula, being bullcrap when without any numbers they put biles on 48 and ML on 71 when they clearly dont have accurate numbers nor information
. u still dont get my point, stick to reading ESPN because it is an "established organization"
I will again refer you to my example about an average article TT writer and jorgen persson writing stupid articles on their site. ESPN is big organization yes, but I dont buy their BS when it comes to accurate journalism and research.
last, i pointed out how a simple research can be done by you and me and get BETTER info for ML and not some NA bullshit, and you still dont like. well fine by me , but its still more accurate than the credibility of an established organization (rrofl!) who's reporters dont even bother to actually DO some research, instead of just copy pasting baidu results.
I bet you didnt even read their presentation. Anyway cheers, read ESPN whenever you want ur facts straight and good luck with that