So I'll never be a table tennis pro, but I am a professional business analyst lol. Here is my analysis of two of the top players in the USA:
Kanak Jha is currently world rank 28. Here's a table of his age and USATT rating at the time (based on this page:
https://usatt.simplycompete.com/userAccount/trn/3431)
| Age | Max of Final Rating |
| 6 | 499 |
| 7 | 1179 |
| 8 | 1658 |
| 9 | 2017 |
| 10 | 2265 |
| 11 | 2387 |
| 12 | 2468 |
| 13 | 2635 |
| 14 | 2603 |
| 15 | 2655 |
| 16 | 2708 |
| 17 | 2708 |
| 18 | 2737 |
| 19 | 2746 |
| 21 | 2780 |
| 23 | 2797 |
| 24 | 2828 |
| 25 | 2832 |
and now Nandan Naresh WR#124 (
https://usatt.simplycompete.com/userAccount/up/5520?uai=5520&embedded=&max=20):
| Age | Max of Final Rating |
| 5 | 520 |
| 6 | 511 |
| 7 | 827 |
| 8 | 1584 |
| 9 | 2030 |
| 10 | 2206 |
| 11 | 2303 |
| 12 | 2379 |
| 13 | 2381 |
| 14 | 2528 |
| 15 | 2558 |
| 16 | 2686 |
| 17 | 2704 |
| 18 | 2706 |
As you can see OP- like many others are saying, you have some serious catching up to do. Kanak was almost 2400 when he was your age. Nandan was 2300. You can also see how much the rating hikes slow down once they reached 2300-2400.
A line chart can help you see how it levels off at the higher ratings:
Kanak:
View attachment 37123
Nandan:
View attachment 37124
Kanak improved faster in his early years but Nandan eventually closely matched his rated when comparing age-to-age.
Now its not to say your goal is impossible, but when you analyze the best of the best in the USA, you have a lot of work to do. I always think about how Sinner didnt get serious with Tennis until he was 13, so yeah anything is possible, but it really does take more than just work ethic to be the best of the best.
Stay humble, stay hungy and good luck.