This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
That's actually really weird. I feel that the HAL has a huge dwell on its own, and because of that, there are some rubbers I really can't use with it because it feels like the ball is "glued" to the blade (Hybrid MK Pro being one of those rubbers). That being said, I also think that the arc is somewhat low compared to an ALC blade, and I need to focus more on spinning instead of hitting. Maybe that's what you are talking about, no? On the other hand, I agree with you regarding D80. I love its softer feeling, but on the HAL, I feel the arc is just too low.
So yesterday , I did a training session focused on consistency, and indeed I felt the rubber was different . I probably did a bad job when I glued the fresh sheet because yesterday I could feel the usual dwell of the D05. Still, I think I will try to downgrade it. The opening balls are amazing, but I find myself hitting out of the table when trying to finish the point.
On the other hand , my training partner (who admittedly is weaker than me) couldn't place the ball on the table consistently after my open-ups. I don't want to give up on the monstrous spin that D05 can generate.
I'm still undecided between Fastarc G1 or Glayzer . I will probably buy both and test later this season.
I would be interested to learn what you think about the difference between the G1 and Glayzer. Both are very good rubbers, and it is really just going to come down to what feels right for you. I personally would go with the G1 over the Glayzer. The Glayzer is a good rubber without doubt. But something about it just left me a bit flat, but my mate, who plays well with it, loves it. He does have a more varied game than I do, and I would say he is a better defensive player (I take a game to Topspin ASAP). The G1 IMO delivered more power, which is important to me. I think the G1 is one of the best value to performance rubbers on the market.