Search results

Words of a coward. Good luck to you. I won't bother responding to you anymore.

go ahead. Share the data and let's look at it.

Btw Mr Coward, where is your match video? How come you never post your video?

I don't even understand your question. I don't play with different paddles to find the best paddle. I play with different paddles because it's just fun to tryout new things. I also find it fun to play high level matches using cheap equipment. Last week I played my 2150 rated LP chopper...

I don't disagree with any of those things. I never argued any of those points. Can you read? In fact, #4 is my point to begin with. Over the long run, WCQ's "shooting average" is higher, so long term will conform to the mathematical average. That is all.

Good. Just leave it at that. I never said there is 100% confirmed conclusion. You are the one talking as if you are some expert. I'm just stated my opinion, and at least I'm willing to stand behind it with a friendly prize money. You seem to believe that Harimoto's brilliant strategy is not...

BTW, if I COULD somehow magically tell both Harimoto and WCQ "don't make any adjustments, just play the way you did in this recent match", I would still make my same offer. I'm not counting on the adjustments to be in my favor. I'm counting on the long term mathematics, or the "shooting...

It's not a strawman. My point is that WCQ threw in a lot of unforced errors that are uncharacteristic of him when he is on his game like when he played Truls. Your point is that Harimoto "made" him have unforced errors. Well, if you truly believe that Harimoto can just "make" WCQ have errors...

You don't even understand my argument. So just forget it. You believe whatever you like. I have my own opinion about the recent match. And I have an opinion about their future matches based on mathematical odds. It's a free country. Just leave it like that.

What are you even talking about. Can you show me ONE time where I said Harimoto didn't play a decent match? What I said was that WCQ was OFF his game, and Harimoto did his job. In fact, now YOU are backtracking and arguing my point. My entire point is that I believe in mathematical odds. WCQ...

I knew it. Nothing but a coward you are. You don't believe anything you spent half the thread arguing about. You said I'm wrong for believing that WCQ just had a bad shooting night. If you believe that, then take the deal. What a joke you are. Yet you talk down to others and pretend you are...

Since I'm so naive, get one of your buddies to take the deal. So simple. Since i'm clearly wrong, just come claim the money. I will pay any of you $20 for each match Harimoto wins from WCQ.

Btw, I don't dislike Harimoto. I said, his match against FZD impressed me very much. He proved that on his good days, he is on the same level as the top Chinese players. So he is an elite level player on his good days. To me, his match against FZD at the olympics is much more meaningful...

That's what I thought. All talk, but can't back it up. Anybody else that actually stands behind their word want to take the deal?

who cares. Do you want to do the deal or not? If you can't stand behind your word, you don't sound very credible. You literally just watched Harimoto destroy WCQ. You spent half a thread arguing about how Harimoto was so good at forcing WCQ into error. You have ever advantage. I'm giving you...

I seriously don't get what everybody is clamoring about. I don't like to argue. Let's just make it simple. From now until 2028, I will pay you $20 for each game that Harimoto takes off of WCQ. You pay me $20 for each game that WCQ takes off of Harimoto. Fair Deal? Any takers? If you are so...

I'm so confused. Why does Yasaka make the core so thick? Isn't the idea to make a competitor to the W968? Why do they make the core so much thicker? Also, shouldn't the headsize be bigger to match the w968?

The point was that I felt my topspin game, fh and bh felt like an 8 relative to the players in my area and around my level. You're free to disagree. But how could you possibly even form an opinion, you haven't seen me play any of the players around me? When I play these 1900 players in my local...

Glad somebody else can see the obvious. The wcq vs truls was not the same wcq against Harimoto. He had a bad shooting night. You say 97%. Honestly looked more like 75% to me. Just error after error, free point giveaway

Easy answer to your question. 1) I DID view Harimoto's loss to togami as a bad shooting night. Anytime they face off, i would put harimoto as the slight favorite. Until Togami proves that he is long term the better player. I did jest and say Harimoto is not even the best player on his team...