Search results

The sticky bit is stuck.

PrinterError: Paper Jam

Taking it not from newtonian first principles, but from actual (reported) measurements, Ma Long reportedly produced a top end of ~7000rpm(~116rps), and Xu Xin of 7700rpm (~128rps). I'd say that's pretty much in line with BB's predictive computations. Source: Spin Measuring at China Open.

My main concern would be durability. Not because that's effectively a price factor, but because I value reliable long-term performance (or in other words: graceful degradation). An otherwise excellent rubber that steeply sags off in a couple of weeks (looking at you, Rasant Grip!) is...

Well, "needed"... I can do without, of course. But I'd definitely have a look there at the unread items there whenever the occasion arises, whereas the site - that's a once or twice week thing for me. In a browser, not mobile. The RSS feed will do, though; it gets me new threads, at least...

Having played with G1 (still playing it now, have been for the last 3 or so years) as well as P1 — I could play with both, but G1 has "that feeling" of grabbing, chewing on, the ball then spitting it out a bit more. That feeling makes you hit confidently. Much like T05, in that, except that the...

I've played with both, and don't really think it's that much of a difference. And I too slightly prefer T05 in 1.9mm over 2.1mm.

Apparently "Glayzer" is very hard to spell.

Both are fast. From way too fast to extremely way too fast for mortals. Both have immense spin generation capabilities, with both requiring outstanding tecnique (involving deep contact) to leverage them. Control: see speed, take the converse. I don't know about the durability of Platinum...

A simple DIY lifehack would be to put the table legs in buckets, empty paint cans or somesuch. That will raise the table by a few mm, but that shouldn't be too big a deal. Moist/damp will be a problem for most tables, however. Most of them are laminated wood, and are prone to bending, or even...

The probabilistic predictive grain of the LLM-approach in GPT-3 is a surefire way to arrive at bland mediocrity. Expect no outspokenness there, no surprises; just a highly predictable stream of platitudes and commonly parroted (mis)beliefs.

I am also inclined to believe it's a Shore A hardness, which is entirely common for CN manufacturers. That is one hard rubber, though. In the Asker C scale that roughly translates to 67. (Yes, happy be.)

T05 is edgy, fiery, fast and hard to control in passive play. It has a high throw, and generates spin easily on active strokes. It's so reactive, though, that the ball shoots off fast if the serving brush touch isn't light enough. It spins very well. T80 feels relatively dead on passive...

TTD is going great. I guess. Still no tapatalk, still [email protected]. Things used to, well, work, a while ago.

So — this is about measuring spin sensitivity. I like it, but since raw data is always in want of interpretation, what's your take, @OP?

Tenergy 05 did not feel revolutionary when I first played with it (coming from Rasant Grip, I believe). I liked it, and it felt great - except for the terrible amount of avoidable mistakes it also brought to the table. Not for me. Rozena: fine. T05: a few notches too feisty.

Big rectangular nothing in Tapatalk so far, and everybody's still [email protected].

Ping?

Don't think the "equipment matters?" Q has been answered here TBH. Ceteris paribus would prescribe the same level of acquaintance with the material in a comparative test. So either let Dima train a while (say, a couple of thousands of hours) with the premade, or compare a high end blade...

Dima 11 : 6 Dan