Search results

That is what I figured and exactly what I asked but I got attacked for it lol

It was a simple question which you refused to answer and then threw the first punch. I'll ask again though: did anyone ever say it was "unplayable" or that "they couldn't lift backspin if their life depended on it" on this thread? Because those were what you put in quotes on your original...

I didn't say it was... I asked if those phrases you put in quotes were actual quotes or not. It's a valid question since the thread OP has a history of re-writing and deleting his comments but good job on being unnecessarily rude because someone didn't agree with your opinion that you're stuck...

Hilarious. Please show me the other 2200 players you know that are casually playing points like this in street shoes lol. Also considering that this is probably a few years after he retired from serious training.

After reading through the thread I don't see any those two quotes you mentioned... is it a deleted/edited comment or did you just make up quotes that nobody said lol?

On the women's side obviously not but on the men's side there are a lot who would.

They need to prove the concept first before making splash signings left and right. I am not disputing your point about the schedule...

I am not saying anything about the airfare stipend. I am saying that there are very wealthy owners, founders, sponsors, and other people involved with MLTT right now who have the money and desire to get big names more involved. And as I've said twice it remains to be seen how they want to spend...

It is not hearsay for me.

I am simply saying that there are very very very wealthy team owners, sponsors, and people involved with MLTT. That they have set a stipend on airfare expenses doesn't really relate to the discussion about if they would be willing to pony up for a household name when given the opportunity.

MLTT does, but whether or how they decide to do it is TBD

I'm not going to watch another 20 minutes of Glayzer reviews but based on your summary it is again converging on what Butterfly claims the rubber is, what most public reviews say of it, and what this thread says of it. Whether it is uninspiring or just good enough is up to everyone based on...

Yes, and then he throws a tantrum when someone does it better than him lol. Been this way a while but now the American crowd is seeing it firsthand at Teams in November, US Open in December, and now MLTT Pleasanton in January.

Despite Olah's usual bitching and then sad attempt to serve super illegally which backfired.

And I know who you are talking about pricing themselves out :ROFLMAO: MLTT has the money, not yet sure about the ability to reach the masses (outside the Bay Area where they can ride the coattails of Lily's popularity)

It is fascinating that you watched that review and concluded that they said it was good enough for them when he clearly said that he doesn't recommend the rubber even for intermediate players and continually harped on the lack of shot quality which is, again, what people in this thread are...

His amateur hitting friend said "it is acceptable for the price" and that it would be better suited to a faster blade like ZLC or SZLC to compensate for the low power. I assume most people aren't going to upgrade to a ZLC or SZLC blade just for the privilege of playing Glayzer. The friend also...

So when Gan, a former Chinese provincial player who was likely upwards of 2600 USATT equivalent at his peak, and is one of the only trusted online equipment reviewers by high level players and even pros, says repeatedly in his review that G09c is slow, lacks power, lacks quality, isn't suitable...

Realistically he is using a customized blade that is very different from market version anything lol. But I am not sure at all and am just referencing XIOM marketing.

What makes you say that?