The side angle isn't THAT bad, as long as the camera isn't static and follows the action (and zooms out when the players play away from the table). It's just that the corner angle is VASTLY superior. I mean, look how great this is: I'd use a wider angle lens, though...
And the sponsor ads are...
I must admit I've gotten used to the side angle. It still sucks when they place the camera too high, but the Singapore example is actually rather good.
It's still super annoying when the players move away and exit the frame, but that's easily remedied by zooming out and slightly swiveling the...
I can live with the net-level angle when there's an actual cameraman behind the camera, moving it left or right when the players move away from the table. But overall, I think it was bad idea and wouldn't mind seeing it go.
My team, the STK Srdoci 1, won our first match at the Croatian "HEP Superleague" yesterday, 3-2, after being down 2-1 and facing a match point. We started the championship with two back-to-back defeats, though we were burdened with injuries. Still are, sadly.
Holy cow, the final game of the bronze medal match was epic! Go Lilly!
Also, the camera work is absolutely phenomenal, and I'd say, a huge slap in the face of the travesty that was the German Open coverage.
I don't buy it. Simultaneous coverage from multiple tables has been common for years, and we've rarely experienced annoyances of this magnitude. Certainly not in the last couple of years.
The grey ones from DHS look nice as well, but it still has a lot more to do with the lighting and camera angles relative to the light source.
Last year's German Open was played on Donic tables which have a lighter matte blue surface, and it looked absolutely perfect: