This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Basically, the difference isn't significant enough to be noticed. It can go either way after all.Ding! ding! ding! -- we have a winner folks... (...well kind of... I think 😂).
Honestly speaking, I can't say I've noticed this particular phenomenon myself as a player, as I haven't ever used an inner-composite blade to the point of failure. 🤔🤔 Nor have I ever had a customer or sales rep complain to me before about the life of inner carbon construction blades being generally shorter than that of an outer carbon equivalent (regardless of the brand, type or manufacturer).
What I *can* confirm however is that (generally speaking - as @Tyce correctly points out) there's a potentially higher than normal risk of separation / cracking / delamination problems occuring whenever you try to laminate extremely hard, stiff and inflexible material (such as some modern composite fabrics) directly onto very soft low-density wood (as is often found in your typical blade's core).
In the simplest terms possible, when building a blade, the more dissimilar two proximate materials are in a blade's composition, the more trouble you are going to experience if you also want them to move and flex together. Depending on the materials in question, and the amount of movement you ask of them, sooner or later material fatigue starts to becomes a factor,
You get around this problem by making the relative differences in material properties as small as practically possible, and by ensuring the surrounding layers are lending their support.
When planning a blade you also need to allow anisotropic material to be true to its nature. Wood is *always* going to be substantively stronger or weaker along one plane compared to others (hence the use of the term anisotropic). Sure modern composites can help add symmetrical, multidimensional stiffness to the mix, but that's still doesn't change the underlying nature of the softer weaker wood located right next to it.
In theory, as outer composite layers are typically surrounded by layers of denser harder material than you find in the core, there's a slightly smaller risk of fatigue, as mechanical forces are typically slightly better distributed throughout the layers.
TL: DR Version....
Eh... The general idea has some technical merit to it, but it all depends on the blade in question, the user, and its operating environment.
As always, mileage and/or individual user results may vary.