Latest reviews

Pros
  • Great spin
  • Great speed
  • Good block
Cons
  • Pricey
Been using this rubber for my backhand for 2 months, and I have already been liking it alot! It has great spin and speed, which is good for doing backhand loop. I also like to use it for blocking, as it can absorb the opponent's power and then send it back fast and stable. I do however, have some trouble at the beginning of using this rubber on a carbon blade, but it can be adjusted. The only downside is that this rubber is very expensive ($75 AUD). But overall, it is a great rubber!
Speed
8.4
Spin
8.4
Durability
5.5
Control
6.5
Pros
  • Tacky
  • Good control
  • cheap price
Cons
  • smelly
After using this rubber model for 2 years for my forehand, I still greatly enjoy using it. It is very good for looping, as it can generate lots of spin. It also gives a very good control on the ball, however, the downside of that is a little lacking on the speed. The rubber also smells not very nice at the beginning, however, the smell goes away gradually. The rubber is also relatively cheap, which makes it a good choice.
Speed
6.6
Spin
8.6
Durability
7
Control
8.7
Pros
  • good feel
  • Good speed
  • Good power
Cons
  • pricey
I have been using this blade for 2 months now, with H3 neo on forehand and Tenergy 05 on backhand. I like the speed of this blade, as comparing to a wood blade, this carbon blade delivers speed and power. With a fast backhand rubber, it can be difficult to get the ball to stay on the table at the beginning, but after a while, it can be adjusted. The forehand was not hard to adjust from a wood blade, and the increase in speed and power is easily noticeable. The downside I feel with this blade is the reduction in the dwell time when compared to a wood blade. Also, I find this blade to be a bit pricey.
Speed
8
Control
7
Hardness
8
Durability
0
Pros
  • quite durable
  • most are round
Cons
  • heavy
  • hard
I've played some hours lately with this ball and for me it is very hard and also heavier than celluloid balls. Most of the balls in the package are round but there are also some which aren't round at all. It doesn't brake so quick as others.
Roundness
5.5
Hardness
8.8
Speed
6.6
Durability
6.7
Pros
  • reaction trainin
Cons
  • not round
  • short durability
we have about 100 plastic balls and about 40% are "round",the rest are ecpliptical...
the durability is poor.
the rest is as it should be.
because of the non roundness the ball is good for reaction training but it can be sometimes frustrating(the non standard ball rebound)
Roundness
5.5
Hardness
5.9
Speed
6.8
Durability
5.4
Pros
  • Good Start Up
  • Controllable
  • Cheap
Cons
  • Not that hard
I used it when I first started playing and it was really good for learning shots. When paired with Donic Vario or Donic Acuda its a formidable combonation.
Speed
8.2
Control
9
Hardness
7.3
Durability
8.4
Pros
  • Best brand
Cons
  • Cracks easily
  • Expensive
I bought the ball immediately after its release to try it out, but I wasn't satisfied. I expected it to be a lot more durable (cracked 3 balls during my first training /2 hrs/) and it sounds and is shaped very odd. The celluloid balls are a lot better shaped (more rounded) and they don't sound like they're cracked even if they are not. Overall though you can't spot many differences between the plastic and celluloid balls, but compared to the plastic balls from other manufacturers these are not the best you can get.
Roundness
4.3
Hardness
6.6
Speed
7.3
Durability
3.3
Pros
  • True Bounce
  • Solid Feel
  • Top of wght spec
Cons
  • It's a Poly Ball
The Nexy 40+ Poly Ball is a SEAMLESS 40+ Poly ball that as of summer 2015 is the best thing out there for players who use a solid impact. Weight is the extreme upper end of specs, bounce is true, ball has the SOLID feel at impact that gives you feedback on your powerloops and drives.

This ball lasts WAY longer than quality Celluloid *** balls. In Korea, I would go through 2-3 packs (6 packs) of cell balls in a month of full time play and I went through only TWO balls in the last month playing full time in Boston.
Roundness
9.3
Hardness
9.2
Speed
8.7
Durability
9.3
Pros
  • Light
Quick Reflection, Light weight, both of these characteristic enable me to have a quick step, nice one.
Comfort
9.2
Grip
8.2
Durability
8
Weight
2.9
Pros
  • LOW Price
  • GRIP!
  • The LOOK
These Petra Plus shoes are an upgrade to the already Excellent $55 Petra TT shoes. I have have used these for years and I get 9 months of 4 hrs a day play before they get wore enough to lose a little grip. That is astounding life. The Petra Plus have the patent leather look in Black and Red accents. They go good with the Contrast Jersey and their red and blue/black theme.

I was slipping bad on two year old shoes at my club needing water on shoes every point. I put these shoes on and did NOT need the water towel.

I really like how they look with my red/black jersey. Thee shoes are better than many shoes costing 2-3 times the price.

Here are the Nexy Korea Pics...

petra_plus3_zpst1mlxzhk.jpg
Comfort
8.1
Grip
9
Durability
9.2
Weight
5.5
Pros
  • Grip
  • Control
  • Easy to cut
Cons
  • Weight as usual
Have two Astro glued on 190 Cpen. Astro M black FH and Astro S red RPB. Uncut weight of black is 67.7g and red 66.5g which are on the heavy side. Blade itself is 84.5g and total setup weight is a manageable 186.8g. This rubber is a heavy weight contender as usual.

Astro has a shine and grainy top sheet. Initial feel is that Astro got lots of grip and dwell in play with less bounce than standard Airoc. Could change after some breaking in (feels more alive after a few days). Final speed is more or less the same if not better. Any difference in feel could be due to the freshness of the new sheets. Can't say it is a hugh step up from Airoc but it is definitely not any let down.

I see a pip structure difference between the two. Airoc's pip is very small and short in a cylindrical shape. Astro is also small but looks trapezoid.
Astro is pretty good on its own and strike a perfect balance between Speed, Spin and Control with a capital "C".

If you check the ratings between Calibra Tour M, Airoc M and Astro M on the package, they are very much the same in every categories with the new Astro reaching 152 in speed. But the small print said maximum rating is 150 so Stiga has to make their new rubber look good and exceed the Airoc's already high 149 by 3 points. I think they can make up something out of nothing if they have to.

One word about cutting. I found it among the easiest rubber to cut. The same cutter can't give a clean cut through the Calibra Tour sponge. That is one big plus for me. I hate jagged edges.

If it is any lighter I may give it 5 stars.

airocastro1.jpg


airocastro2.jpg


airocastro3.jpg


airocastro4.jpg
Speed
8
Spin
8.2
Durability
7
Control
8.2
Pros
  • durability
  • nice control
Cons
  • slow
veryy slow rubber only for beginners
block is easy
topspin is less spinny and slow
Speed
3
Spin
5.1
Durability
10
Control
8.1
Pros
  • Spinny
  • Loop monster
  • Durable
Cons
  • Expensive
Simply the best rubber for attacking players. Many brands have tried to copy and outperform, all failed. Many people who cant afford tried to pull it down, all failed. This rubber for me is the best.

Its is expensive but you'll surely get your money's worth.
Speed
9.1
Spin
9.1
Durability
9.1
Control
9.1
Pros
  • Tremendous spin
  • Durable
  • Control
Cons
  • Not the fastest
  • Bouncy on serves
The P7 is a great rubber. Massive spin but also easy to control. I like the fairly high arc which is IMO easier to control. For example I've tried the Airoc M which has a lower throw and I find it more difficult to control. The speed is okay but there are lots of better options on the market if you want a fast rubber. I use it on a OFF- blade but I think the P7 is better on a OFF or even OFF+ blade.
The rubber is also very durable. I have been playing with the P7 now for a year(4-5hrs/week) and okay, it doesn't have the unbelievable amount of spin of the first months but my opponents still struggle to block my spinny topspins. Serving requires some skill because the rubber is sometimes too bouncy.

I definitely recommend this rubber to those who have a spinny topspin but still want decent control.
The P7 is pretty pricey but that shouldn't hold you back because it lasts long.
Speed
7.5
Spin
10
Durability
9
Control
8.5
Cons
  • Not round
This is STIGA's training plastic ball and all I can say is don't bother. These balls come in a pack of 6 and not a single one of them was round, they all wobbled when I tried to spin them on the table. If you overlook the fact that they are not round they play like most seamed plastic balls. Reduced bounce and spin when compared to the old ball.
Roundness
4
Hardness
6
Speed
6
Pros
  • Price
  • Really Fast
  • Control
Cons
  • Its not popular!
  • Medium+Sweetspot
  • Medium
Kiri, Energy Carbon, Hinoki. 5 ply. 7.0mm . 87gr
2x Xiom Omega IV Asia MAX

An outstanding product.

I purchased this blade last week and i must say im surprized. Tried Stigas and Btys powerhouses such as Clipper, RW5, TBALC,Primorac Carbon, etc...but none assembled so well the Carbospeed characteristcs.

Tons of speed. Lightning fast. Drives and hits are top tier. You can easily place the ball even close to the table.
Loops are quite tricky due medium dwell you must make a quick movement and use wrist otherwise will hit net or overtable.
The throw is linear compared to most blades. There have to be spin in the ball to it produces an arc.
Paired with Xiom Omega IV Asia short game is a piece of cake. Pretty dead rubber if you dont engage sponge but once you do it has monstruous spin and control. Flicks are quite good when movement is quick.
3+ meters from table is easy, top spin rallies are menageable, id say easy but i lack the technique so wont go further.

In short :
Amazing blade. Easy to use.I dont know if i paired to exact holy grail rubber for this blade but despite slow strokes doesnt work that well, i cant think any drawback.
Finishing and Craftmanship top tier. The handle is so beaultiful that i feel bad to have to dirty it. :/
The blade is so well balanced. Even with medium++ weight rubber. 44g i think.
Price. Ohhh the price. Bought for only 60USD.
Not for lazyass strokes. You must go for every shot. Feet, knee, hips, back, shoulder, arm, wrist, blade!
Very controlable short game. Tricky close to the table due linear throw.
Speed
9.5
Control
9
Hardness
5
Durability
8
Pros
  • Spinny
  • Controlable
  • Flexible
Cons
  • Small Handle
This is such an outstanding blade. I've played with Tenergy 05 in forehand and Tenergy 64 in backhand. This blade is very nice for backhand, you can block, attack well with Tenergy 64 and Spinny, speed forehand topspin with Tenergy 05; and great feeling and control in both hand. Its handle is just a bit small.
Speed
8.6
Control
8.6
Hardness
6.1
Durability
8.5
Pros
  • Great Control
  • Touch
  • Cost
Cons
  • Back from table
This blade overall is a wonderful piece of craft. Not only is this blade pretty cheap at a value of 34-52 dollars depending on the website, but this blade offers really good control. This blade can basically help you direct the ball to any direction you want with enough control and speed to do so. The good this about this blade is that it is not to fast where you can't control your shorts, but at a medium-fast speed to control your shots well. The only con is when you play with the blade away from the table. This blade requires a bit more power/energy on your strokes in order to the ball on the table. Overall, I recommend this blade to anyone that looking for a cheap, not to fast, controllable, and named after a professional blade.
Speed
8
Control
9.5
Hardness
7.7
Durability
9
Pros
  • Tons of feeling
  • Huge Sweetspot
  • Spin machine
Cons
  • Not that much
  • power after 3m
  • from table.
As everyone mention, the feeling. The feeling with this blade is amazing, i cant describe.

Sweetspot is almost entire blade. Mine is 87g.
Fast, medium/hard bit of flexure.
Control is the best ive tested. 9.5 for sure.

I use with Rakza7 max both sides.
I can produce monstruous spin in both slow loop or loop drive shots.My serve is very damaging. The only problem i have is flat hits but i think its more due technic/rubber than this beautiful blade.

I recommend to anyone who like to play until 3m of table, more than that i think will lack some power.
Speed
8
Control
9.5
Hardness
6
Durability
9
Pros
  • Light
  • Nice feel
  • Control
Cons
  • Vibrates a lot
  • Medium-sweetspot
I bought this blade to re educate my strokes. Previsouly i used Rosewood V with 2 Rakzas, way too fast to my level.

I paired this blade with two Mark V AD. Yea, it is slow, reaaly slow. But that is just what i wanted. This combo has a really low throw, i mean it, so every shot i have to do the proper technic to hit the other side.

Spin i think its low but mainly due the rubber. only if i dig deep in the sponge i can produce good spin. Thats good for my strategy because oponent is getting used to you flat and low balls and then you make a spinny slow loop. Due its elasticity i can make really fast backhand swings, being my primary kill shot.

It is awesome for blocking topspins but tricky to do so with flat hits. Sweet spot is medium.

Overall id rate this blade as 8, as long as you are a newplayer/developing intermediate. You must go for every shot, you will have a good control. And its light, mine came as 77g. With rubber i think its around 140g.
Speed
6
Control
8
Hardness
2.3
Durability
8.5
Top