It's great rubber on its own but I found it disappointing in several aspects especially when you compare it to previous version of Target(Ultim/Force).
I'll try comment on its performance while comparing some aspects to Target Ultim 47.5/50
Weight:
Although not as heavy as some Chinese rubbers and Tibhar Evolution series, it's still pretty heavy (u can check Dan's review) which is quite a letdown especially when u compare to Target Ultim which was (almost) 10g lighter per uncut sheet ... even lighter than Target Pro S39.
Loop:
Very high dwell time thanks to very flexible topsheet, even more than Ultim which I already found to be pretty elastic already. This makes hard loops very controllable while really powerful when u need it (easier than Ultim as well). Under stronger impacts (drive-loop) Spin is also one of highest among Euro rubbers alongside Victas V>15, Omega VII and you don't need aggressive Chinese strokes to extract the most out of it.
Softer loops however, especially lifting backspin , could be an issue sometimes. The topsheet is very grippy only when it deforms up to certain extents, meaning on slow loops the rubber doesn't deform enough to offer sufficient grip for highest-level of spin, it's still stronger than most cheapish/last-gen rubbers, but definitely much less impressive than drive-looping with it.
Target Ultim in contrast, has excellent surface grip which allow incredibly spinny slow loops. Spin is about just as high as Target pro in drive loops but you would need more accurate shots than Target Pro to keep the ball in play as well as getting the spin you want.
Block/Punch:
Not best / direct rubber for this due to elastic topsheet, but still top-class control with lots of speed on tap when needed. Not too spin-sensitive. I would say it's friendly than quite some top-class rubbers such as V>15(also pretty good in blocking), MX-P and Tenergy (except T25) in this aspect.
I do find myself blocking/hitting even better with Target Ultim though due to stiffer topsheet.
Serve+Short games(chop, flicks):
This is the most disappointing part for me as short games is my biggest strength as well as my favorite "shots", and Target Pro felt like a significant downgrade from Target Ultim.
As mentioned earlier the topsheet lacks a bit of grip until the ball dwell into the deeper "layers" of it, meaning that to get the most spin out of the serves, you would need to do high-toss serves just like Hugo Calderano would do. If the opponent was returning the ball short with low/no spin and u want disturb the game flow by adding strong backspin to the ball it would also be a pretty difficult task. In Dan's video you might've seen Can Akkuzu chopping the ball with plenty of backspin in short games but that's because Dan gave him strong backspin in advance which makes deforming the topsheet for the receiver quite a bit easier to do. Flicks are easy with plenty of safety margin because of soft topsheet, but again it's a bit hard to generate strong spin unless your stroke really lets the ball "drill" through layers.
Target Ultim on other hand, can easily generate very strong spin in short games thanks to very grippy top layer. Medium-toss serves are more than enough to generate incredible spin and with some practise it's feasible to generate REALLY short ghost serves. It's also very easy to keep the ball short and flicks are more direct on harder impacts (again thanks to stiffer topsheet).
Conclusion: If u must buy Target Pro as Ultim/Force is discontinued, I suggest picking the hardest 51deg sponge version to get the best "surface spin". Also to extract the most out of Target Pro, you would probably need a blade which is pretty slow in lower gears as well as having a REALLY stiff top ply in order to allow the ball to have the best dwelling time on the topsheet, but even then the Target Pro does not really offer more spin than the previous Target Ultim/ Target Force. Pro is more friendly / easier, and maybe a bit spinnier in topspin rallies under very strong strokes (thanks to high dwell time) but that's about it, and even that seems a bit pointless in my case due to the massive weight addition to my racket setup which actually upsets my racket balance as well as reducing my stroke speed(as well as spin) and my forearm's agility when it comes to counteracting unexpected shots(I don't have the pro's stamina after all ). My range of toss height variations for my serves, which I often used to throw off my opponents, was also being reduced, as well doing some crazy moves during short games which was possible with Ultim but not with the Pro.
Target Pro is still a pretty good rubber that can compete with many top-class rubbers out there, but having moved back to my Target Ultim right after the Pro, I still see no reason why Cornilleau had to make all these changes to the topsheet.
I'll try comment on its performance while comparing some aspects to Target Ultim 47.5/50
Weight:
Although not as heavy as some Chinese rubbers and Tibhar Evolution series, it's still pretty heavy (u can check Dan's review) which is quite a letdown especially when u compare to Target Ultim which was (almost) 10g lighter per uncut sheet ... even lighter than Target Pro S39.
Loop:
Very high dwell time thanks to very flexible topsheet, even more than Ultim which I already found to be pretty elastic already. This makes hard loops very controllable while really powerful when u need it (easier than Ultim as well). Under stronger impacts (drive-loop) Spin is also one of highest among Euro rubbers alongside Victas V>15, Omega VII and you don't need aggressive Chinese strokes to extract the most out of it.
Softer loops however, especially lifting backspin , could be an issue sometimes. The topsheet is very grippy only when it deforms up to certain extents, meaning on slow loops the rubber doesn't deform enough to offer sufficient grip for highest-level of spin, it's still stronger than most cheapish/last-gen rubbers, but definitely much less impressive than drive-looping with it.
Target Ultim in contrast, has excellent surface grip which allow incredibly spinny slow loops. Spin is about just as high as Target pro in drive loops but you would need more accurate shots than Target Pro to keep the ball in play as well as getting the spin you want.
Block/Punch:
Not best / direct rubber for this due to elastic topsheet, but still top-class control with lots of speed on tap when needed. Not too spin-sensitive. I would say it's friendly than quite some top-class rubbers such as V>15(also pretty good in blocking), MX-P and Tenergy (except T25) in this aspect.
I do find myself blocking/hitting even better with Target Ultim though due to stiffer topsheet.
Serve+Short games(chop, flicks):
This is the most disappointing part for me as short games is my biggest strength as well as my favorite "shots", and Target Pro felt like a significant downgrade from Target Ultim.
As mentioned earlier the topsheet lacks a bit of grip until the ball dwell into the deeper "layers" of it, meaning that to get the most spin out of the serves, you would need to do high-toss serves just like Hugo Calderano would do. If the opponent was returning the ball short with low/no spin and u want disturb the game flow by adding strong backspin to the ball it would also be a pretty difficult task. In Dan's video you might've seen Can Akkuzu chopping the ball with plenty of backspin in short games but that's because Dan gave him strong backspin in advance which makes deforming the topsheet for the receiver quite a bit easier to do. Flicks are easy with plenty of safety margin because of soft topsheet, but again it's a bit hard to generate strong spin unless your stroke really lets the ball "drill" through layers.
Target Ultim on other hand, can easily generate very strong spin in short games thanks to very grippy top layer. Medium-toss serves are more than enough to generate incredible spin and with some practise it's feasible to generate REALLY short ghost serves. It's also very easy to keep the ball short and flicks are more direct on harder impacts (again thanks to stiffer topsheet).
Conclusion: If u must buy Target Pro as Ultim/Force is discontinued, I suggest picking the hardest 51deg sponge version to get the best "surface spin". Also to extract the most out of Target Pro, you would probably need a blade which is pretty slow in lower gears as well as having a REALLY stiff top ply in order to allow the ball to have the best dwelling time on the topsheet, but even then the Target Pro does not really offer more spin than the previous Target Ultim/ Target Force. Pro is more friendly / easier, and maybe a bit spinnier in topspin rallies under very strong strokes (thanks to high dwell time) but that's about it, and even that seems a bit pointless in my case due to the massive weight addition to my racket setup which actually upsets my racket balance as well as reducing my stroke speed(as well as spin) and my forearm's agility when it comes to counteracting unexpected shots(I don't have the pro's stamina after all ). My range of toss height variations for my serves, which I often used to throw off my opponents, was also being reduced, as well doing some crazy moves during short games which was possible with Ultim but not with the Pro.
Target Pro is still a pretty good rubber that can compete with many top-class rubbers out there, but having moved back to my Target Ultim right after the Pro, I still see no reason why Cornilleau had to make all these changes to the topsheet.