This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Active Member
Now before I start I know its mainly marketing based and not scientific, and that wood is a natural product so theres variation... but
I cant work out the matrix in terms of areas of blades that i would like. I've own or tried quite a few of the blades now but it doesn't seem to be consistent to what i like with the scales. Is that just because the matrix makes no sense, or that the difference in composition makes such a big difference they cannot be compared? Or is time and how much they have been played with the biggest factor. Some of the blades that feel the best are the oldest.
I cant work out the matrix in terms of areas of blades that i would like. I've own or tried quite a few of the blades now but it doesn't seem to be consistent to what i like with the scales. Is that just because the matrix makes no sense, or that the difference in composition makes such a big difference they cannot be compared? Or is time and how much they have been played with the biggest factor. Some of the blades that feel the best are the oldest.