Hi everyone,
I've been reading the forum for a long time, but this is my first time posting.
I’m still an active player at 58 years old. In our local club, which competes in the third division of our country, I’m more or less the guy who glues rubbers for most teammates and friends. For the past 7 years we’ve been using only Revolution No. 3 (normal viscosity), and we’ve never had any complaints or strange behavior reported by any of the players. Some players re-glue every 4–5 months, some even more often. No one ever felt that their racket behaved differently after a fresh re-glue. The only thing that sometimes happens is that the racket is maybe 5% faster in the first couple of days — which is normal.
Before applying fresh glue, I always carefully remove the previous layers. In 90% of cases, I apply two layers of glue on the blade and two on the rubber.
About 15 days ago we ran out of Revolution No. 3, so we bought a small bottle of DHS No.15, just enough to re-glue two MX-P rubbers on a Timo Boll ALC (85g) blade. The rubbers are 6 months old and the young player will replace them soon anyway.
By coincidence, I tested his racket the day before re-gluing. Everything felt excellent — great touch, superb control, minimal and very pleasant vibration. Every time I had used his racket before, I loved it; it felt like an extension of my own hand.
This DHS glue is noticeably thicker than Revolution No. 3 — I noticed that immediately. I first tested it on an old rubber to see how it spreads and dries, and then proceeded to glue his actual rubbers: one layer on the blade, two on each rubber.
He took the racket to the evening practice, and afterwards he messaged me saying that the racket doesn’t feel the same at all.
He said: much less control, noticeably higher speed, and most importantly — a new, annoying vibration
Even the sound when bouncing the ball was different — both on the rubber and during play. Let me emphasize that this is a very talented young player, who has been using this exact setup for years and knows his equipment extremely well.
Next day I tested it myself
And honestly… he was right about everything.
The sound was no longer that short, crisp “click” with a gentle pleasant vibration. Instead, it became a deeper, almost “drum-like” sound with a kind of resonance. I’m not even sure how to describe it properly.On service receive, it became much harder to keep the ball short and low — everything was bouncing higher, and overall control was significantly reduced.It also felt like the whole setup had about 10–15% higher arc when looping. All in all, everything maybe could be tolerated, but this unpleasant vibration was bothering both him and me a lot.
We still don’t have Revolution No. 3 to re-glue and compare…
Can the glue alone really change the entire character of the racket this much?
Has anyone experienced something similar?
Does anyone know what could be causing this?
Thanks in advance.
I've been reading the forum for a long time, but this is my first time posting.
I’m still an active player at 58 years old. In our local club, which competes in the third division of our country, I’m more or less the guy who glues rubbers for most teammates and friends. For the past 7 years we’ve been using only Revolution No. 3 (normal viscosity), and we’ve never had any complaints or strange behavior reported by any of the players. Some players re-glue every 4–5 months, some even more often. No one ever felt that their racket behaved differently after a fresh re-glue. The only thing that sometimes happens is that the racket is maybe 5% faster in the first couple of days — which is normal.
Before applying fresh glue, I always carefully remove the previous layers. In 90% of cases, I apply two layers of glue on the blade and two on the rubber.
About 15 days ago we ran out of Revolution No. 3, so we bought a small bottle of DHS No.15, just enough to re-glue two MX-P rubbers on a Timo Boll ALC (85g) blade. The rubbers are 6 months old and the young player will replace them soon anyway.
By coincidence, I tested his racket the day before re-gluing. Everything felt excellent — great touch, superb control, minimal and very pleasant vibration. Every time I had used his racket before, I loved it; it felt like an extension of my own hand.
This DHS glue is noticeably thicker than Revolution No. 3 — I noticed that immediately. I first tested it on an old rubber to see how it spreads and dries, and then proceeded to glue his actual rubbers: one layer on the blade, two on each rubber.
He took the racket to the evening practice, and afterwards he messaged me saying that the racket doesn’t feel the same at all.
He said: much less control, noticeably higher speed, and most importantly — a new, annoying vibration
Even the sound when bouncing the ball was different — both on the rubber and during play. Let me emphasize that this is a very talented young player, who has been using this exact setup for years and knows his equipment extremely well.
Next day I tested it myself
And honestly… he was right about everything.
The sound was no longer that short, crisp “click” with a gentle pleasant vibration. Instead, it became a deeper, almost “drum-like” sound with a kind of resonance. I’m not even sure how to describe it properly.On service receive, it became much harder to keep the ball short and low — everything was bouncing higher, and overall control was significantly reduced.It also felt like the whole setup had about 10–15% higher arc when looping. All in all, everything maybe could be tolerated, but this unpleasant vibration was bothering both him and me a lot.
We still don’t have Revolution No. 3 to re-glue and compare…
Can the glue alone really change the entire character of the racket this much?
Has anyone experienced something similar?
Does anyone know what could be causing this?
Thanks in advance.