This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Well-Known Member
So i am back EJing around thanks to offseason and many things that happened in the last couple weeks or even months probably.
I tested around and played with many high quality and high end blades like TB alc, Ovtcharov innerforce alc and some more. I even tested some newer niche blades like the Xuperman S1 and the Doublefish Project Z.
Now i am in the position of being capable to compare those quite well to my Yinhe Pro 01 i am playing with for some years now (not the entire time, but that is my go to blade i always came back for). And this makes me wonder, is the Pro 01 one of the best bang for your buck blade?
All of the blades i ever played with that cost more than the Pro 01 (especially my favorite for many reason the FZD alc) didnt do much more or more like the exact same thing as the Pro 01.
Some examples:
The FZD alc was slightly crisper and could get more power out, especially when im not in the best position. And the grip is still my favorite by far. But these margins are so freaking tiny, that they dont change my game or any outcome.
The Project Z has a different feel (really slightly). i have a little longer contact and it could be i have more feeling for the ball in some cases because of that. Highend speed, spin and everything else is exactly the same. I even tested it with several different players as trainingpartners, and they couldnt tell a difference aside from the different sound when i hit "through" the blade.
I dont want to make comparison with many more blades because if compare different compositions, ofcourse things change, maybe even a lot depending on the wood and fibers.
Buuuuuuuuut my point is, what do i get more if i pay like 100€-140€ more than i pay for the Pro 01?
Before i was sure that if i pay more i kinda get at least some kind of value, like more spin or power and with rubbers i can somewhat see that, especially if some good "technologies" are at work. But with blades i am not sure at all if that is still the case.
So currently i am struggling to see more value in more expensive blades.
Is that something you experience as well with other kind of blades or am i just lucky that Yinhe put out a really good fucking blade.
Oooooor am i just too oblivious or not good enough to feel the difference although i would line that out as i know a lot of better players who doesnt feel shit and cant tell the difference between inner and outer carbond blades...
Sidenote: That is my 3rd Pro 01 and all of them were almost the same. The only difference i had with one was a slightly (less than a milimeter difference) thinner but wider handle, the rest being on point.
And before this discussion goes into a wrong way and this matters:
I play tabletennis for some decades and on a decent level i would say, as some already know. Current at all time high 1730 german TTR so approximitly around 2k USA rating.
I tested around and played with many high quality and high end blades like TB alc, Ovtcharov innerforce alc and some more. I even tested some newer niche blades like the Xuperman S1 and the Doublefish Project Z.
Now i am in the position of being capable to compare those quite well to my Yinhe Pro 01 i am playing with for some years now (not the entire time, but that is my go to blade i always came back for). And this makes me wonder, is the Pro 01 one of the best bang for your buck blade?
All of the blades i ever played with that cost more than the Pro 01 (especially my favorite for many reason the FZD alc) didnt do much more or more like the exact same thing as the Pro 01.
Some examples:
The FZD alc was slightly crisper and could get more power out, especially when im not in the best position. And the grip is still my favorite by far. But these margins are so freaking tiny, that they dont change my game or any outcome.
The Project Z has a different feel (really slightly). i have a little longer contact and it could be i have more feeling for the ball in some cases because of that. Highend speed, spin and everything else is exactly the same. I even tested it with several different players as trainingpartners, and they couldnt tell a difference aside from the different sound when i hit "through" the blade.
I dont want to make comparison with many more blades because if compare different compositions, ofcourse things change, maybe even a lot depending on the wood and fibers.
Buuuuuuuuut my point is, what do i get more if i pay like 100€-140€ more than i pay for the Pro 01?
Before i was sure that if i pay more i kinda get at least some kind of value, like more spin or power and with rubbers i can somewhat see that, especially if some good "technologies" are at work. But with blades i am not sure at all if that is still the case.
So currently i am struggling to see more value in more expensive blades.
Is that something you experience as well with other kind of blades or am i just lucky that Yinhe put out a really good fucking blade.
Oooooor am i just too oblivious or not good enough to feel the difference although i would line that out as i know a lot of better players who doesnt feel shit and cant tell the difference between inner and outer carbond blades...
Sidenote: That is my 3rd Pro 01 and all of them were almost the same. The only difference i had with one was a slightly (less than a milimeter difference) thinner but wider handle, the rest being on point.
And before this discussion goes into a wrong way and this matters:
I play tabletennis for some decades and on a decent level i would say, as some already know. Current at all time high 1730 german TTR so approximitly around 2k USA rating.