That's good to know. It still points to the fact that their insights have no objective way of being verified as valuable sonce 1) they are being filtered by your biased perspective and 2) saying that Tomo vs Togami would go 5 games isn't particularly deep given they have a history of competition. Just pointing out that using such speculation as a measure of insight says more about your bias than anything else.
His playing style gives Harimoto too much time and his power level doesn't consistently bother Harimoto. Ultimately, he has to find solutions in the short game look for better pushes and counters closer to the table.
Most Tieba users are just like you and me. I can do a lot of speculations and comment a lot if I prefer to. It is a good source for info and points, but I would not cite them to prove anything.
Alexis did not expect/return the 3d balls well from Harimoto. A lot of them came from his not thinking/preparing well before the serves.
I know this but unfortunately, @zeio thinks otherwise and continually shares with us things that we would be better off without in the tournament threads. I am close to creating a Tieba thread.
No one is proving anything. It's to show that no one would raise an eyebrow at them unlike here, which is what I've kept repeating.
Well, maybe it is annoying for someone to see those posts, but still in my opinion not to the extend that the mod needs to interfere.
Tiaba mods delete many many posts as far as I know. Sometimes these arguments came from cultural difference. Coaches in China used to yell/whip (?) students/sons, but that would send them to jails in the western. And I think China is getting more and more like the western in many aspects, especially younger people.
The percentage of serve success for Alexis was about 34%. That told you how well Harimoto figured his game out.
That usually happens when it's not the player but the coach and staff that come up with a different game plan from usual to be executed and the player gets lost when it fails to work.
Not necessarily the mods, because there is just a handful of them and they have said it's the system doing much of the work. After a certain threshold of reports, the system would hide the thread and then the thread starter could appeal the decision but most just don't bother. And then the thread starter becomes a provisional mod for that thread that can also delete the thread and posts within. Only when China is losing badly do you see a crackdown on "dissent", like at the start of WTTC 2026. People argue all the time and then one would block the other, and until the next time that one would ask for the other to come argue again but wonder why the other doesn't reply, then the other would tell the one has forgotten to unblock the other under a different thread... It's funny.
I'd say 60/40 Felix. Hugo hasn't been too convincing lately, but you never know with him. He can suddenly turn it on or off at any moment..
Of course it is definitely an opinion thing and for another time. That said, it ia the only time in all my years of webforuming that someone repeatedly grabs stuff from other forums and cites a lot of non-professional or uncertified opinion as of it was facts. It would be a completely different story if it was insider information or verified news sources. I don't go around pasting stuff from conversations I have in webforums and I only know one person who does.
Miwa was playing very well against CY. Points CY got on her serves were about 28%, and that 's under ML's coaching.
