New rule to invalidate the ghost serve.

says Fair Play First
says Fair Play First
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2012
2,193
727
3,077
heh, it looks a prohibitive rule directly designed to invalidate the "ghost serves" once and for all


IMG_20260507_165335.jpg
 
Last edited:
says Check out my Podcast Talkin' Smash!
says Check out my Podcast Talkin' Smash!
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
TeamJOOLA
Oct 2010
3,095
2,489
6,012
Read 12 reviews
36
No chance this gets through, how can you objectively measure this? Add another line on the table like tennis and pickleball?

I would imagine it's a result of the para showcase final at the US Smash where the Italian player used those serves against Ian Seidenfeld in the final. It was definitely not nice to watch, but I just don't see how a rule can objectively prevent it.
 
says Fair Play First
says Fair Play First
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Jan 2012
2,193
727
3,077
Here is an exemplary ghost serve. Yes, we strongly feel like to ask for a let in this case. Furthermore we gonna to upraise a penalty yellow card for indecent conduct by the server.


 
Last edited:
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Dec 2014
55
136
218
"If the serve, after bouncing on the receiver's court, bounces backwards, it shall be a let serve."
This would make it very difficult (not necessarily impossible) to serve so shorter players can't reach it. I've seen players use these serves against younger players and it's sickening. I once coached a very short 2200-rated kid against a 1700 player who did this on every serve, and the kid lost, deuce in the fifth, with both winning nearly every point on their serve. (The other guy got the match and rating points, but everyone booed him.) As an exhibition trick, I use to practice these serves so that the ball would bounce backward to my side on the first bounce, and once did 14 in a row.
-Larry Hodges
 
Top