Search results

It is what you said, maybe not what you meant. What did you mean then when you said the only way you would change your mind is if he won without using placement. ha.

Sweat is good for the surface of the rubber. if you're ever sweating and need to clean your raquet in game, opposed to just breathing on the blade and cleaning it with your hand use some of your sweat. It's primarily water, with small amounts of ammonia, urea, salt and sugar. Better than using...

I would but it partly frustrated me reading the troll's stuff for so long. Also with him and pnatch banned, there wont be too much more drama in it. Very enjoyable read though and glad I did so.

Big dipper is a great rubber, especially since you can get it in softer variations. I HATE hurricane rubbers simply because of how hard it is. I lose all feeling with it and as a player thats trying to develop, losing feeling is a no go.

Gotcha, so you're just going to argue your point forever no matter what point someone brings up, regardless of how much sense that point makes. Because the only way you'll change your mind according to what you just wrote, is to see them play a game with no variation and the chopper still winning.

If you say so :). What would it take for you to believe the chopper has better technique?

Must have known I was off work today when they sent the worms out. "Let's get shuki to argue with people to test how powerful these things really are, he usually stays out of arguments." Damn those things are strong.

Ahhh I understand now! If a player is frustrated then they think the shot should have been easy for them! gotcha!:cool:

wasn't hijacked, just felt it was similar to the other thread that they posted.

correct. You didn't understand my post. Clearly the chinese are better, and even with the rubber the european players would lose, so why not just let them use it. Also of course the coaches are complaining when the other team is doing something they feel is unfair. This happens in all...

I don't think they say chinese only win because of their equipment. Dima says that they're just on another level. He knows they're better. But If I'm at 1700 and playing someone at 2000 and that 2000 player then decides to use equipment that makes them up to 2100 that I'm not allowed to use. I...

Just spent quite a bit of time reading through this thread and regret missing it when it was happening. Don't want to bump it but I do want to Thank You for giving me quite a few laughs.

Ever think maybe he got pissed because he couldn't win?

woah woah woah, because he has a different definition of quality. I saw this too but thought it must have been a language gap because surely he knows chops would arc less if there's more spin.

It does seem hypocritical, but they all just want a level playing field. They may boost their rubber like 90% of pro's but then they see these other players boosting an even more superior rubber than theirs. They feel like they're at an even bigger disadvantage than they already were against...

No, i'm not willing to spend that kind of money on a blade I wouldn't like. And I highly doubt Ma Long would charge someone 2500rmb (380USD) to sign a blade and take a picture with them. If I'm understanding you right, and please correct me if I'm wrong. You're saying Ma Long sells his blade...

If pro's of this level want something for free from another brand, their sponsors are willing to get that product for them. Look at Fan Zhendong, do you think he plays with a Stiga Infinity VPS, or stiga is just willing to let him use what he wants and hides what it really is.

This is my point, if you believe you're playing with the real thing, you'll love it. If a player has confidence in their equipment then their execution will be much better. The confidence that TT4Life has in his equipment is what you want.

Nobody is saying the attacker has bad technique or is low level. Just that the chopper's is better from the video clip we've been given.

If you're perceiving from the video that the looper has more spin that's fine. But he also has less control of his loops than the chopper has on his chops. I'm trying to understand your definition of quality opposed to my criteria. Surely the looper's quality of loop can't be better quality if...