Search results

Her issues returning that reverse spin into the forehand give a mild insight into her struggles with lefties. She needs to do a bit better with that serve over time.

How anyone could watch the Hayata match and see ut as the end of someone's career is beyond me.completely.

What a match!

How is it that Hayata wins Hayata rallies against everyone but the top Chinese? Its crazy how against the top 4, her scrambling and retrieving falls apart while it works effectively against juat about everyone else.

Togami, if he figures table tennis out, the universe is in trouble.

Men have played on table 1, women on table 2. This has been consistent throughout the event so far.

Winners of the Draw: Odo (W), Harimoto (M) Losers of the Draw: Hayata(W), Togami (M)

She is rejuvenating with a break, she'll be fine. Hayata has a broken hand, Miwa is sixteen and the golden child, Ito is cannon fodder for the CNT, Hashimoto chops, and Odo hides her serves and will be unmasked by TTR. That leaves Hirano to save the day. Tieba users have spoken.

It works if there is a 3 way tie of matches. But otherwise, it is largely useless.

The ITTF regulation specifies drawing of lots if a tie cannot be resolved after getting to points between the players...

Yes, and then Dima pointed out the let and that the point needed to be replayed. And the referee came to the table and agreed. It's straightforward.

https://www.tabletennisdaily.com/forum/topics/ittf-mens-and-womens-world-cup-macao-2025-4-14-20.35712/post-519331

There was no time to call the let and the let was correctly called after review. If Lin had missed the shot, they would have claimed the let too. Yes, Lin got affected the most. And yes, Lin would probably have won if not for the mistake. But the mistake was correctly handled.

The light arguably distracted Dima as well. I rewatched the video and whether Lin was complaining about the edge or the lighting is unclear, but he probably was pointing out the edge. Yes, the lighting staff robbed Lin for sure. But the main point is that a let is a let, it affected both...

She made a comment about it - check zeio's post.

Dima had every right to a let as well if you actually watched the video. Let's not make this about what the umpire called or did not call. Lin clearly called it, and if he had missed, it would have been a replayed point.

No, the let is the let and the let came before the point was completed. You don't call let and take it back when you win the point.

It's ridiculous. Cost him the match right there.

You might be surprised...

Yes, Dima needs to win the game to win because of that 11-8.