So Hayata's yesterday lost probably humbles us a little, the JNT critics and Hina protagonists. Well she won two tournaments before and her lost to Eunchong was very marginal 9:11 in 7th ... Korean player gave her some problems with the serves as @Zeio noticed, just like Kato did in Top12. So...
I would like to swear ... but I won't ... : )
This serve to the fh and than playing down the line to the bh combination is what's causing problems to Hayata ..
Looks like Gnanasekaran has lots of merits ...
; )
I watched him against Falck in Oman, he lost only in the 7th.
Before he beat Khanin, Anthony Amalraj, Lebesson. In Qatar he already passed Truls Moregard ...
"There's life after Olympics" - in my opinion, yes and ... no. Depends what Japan wants to achieve. Don't get me wrong I'm just a guy who's excited about table tennis, plays it, likes to watch it, helps in a club (in Poland actually ; ) but it's your team. I get that.
CNT was unchallenged for...
Now you got me interested ... ; )
Just kidding.
Yeah, but it's probably not nice to laugh if somebody is crying after the loss (Oman against Hayata). She's just very ambitious.
Ahh ... second of all : ) I wouldn't try to position those two terms against each other. I never studied political science and I'm not even sure it they both should be considered as alternatives.
Both democracy and meritocracy as an effective decision making processes, have their strengths and...
Ahh ... first of all, I think we are using words democracy and meritocracy a little bit incorrectly. I mean if anything a more "democratic" selection (well it wasn't really democratic senso stricto, so the word should not be used at all) was the one done by the CNT and meritocratic one, was more...