Search results

  1. Innerforce Layer ALC

    Reply to review by 'steve888' on item 'Innerforce Layer ALC'

    Interesting you only gave this blade a 6 for speed, that seems very slow. That would be slower than my Petr Korbel blade.
  2. Nittaku New Products 2024

    I bought mine on Amazon so not sure I could have chosen a weight as they don't advertise weight, I would have preferred around 88 grams. Amazon was significantly cheaper than other places including eBay
  3. Nittaku New Products 2024

    interesting, the more dense the faster it most likely be. Nittaku seems to have wide variance though , TT website measured there's at 82g and mine is 94g. To me to much variance. It would nearly like playing with a nearly different blade.
  4. Nittaku New Products 2024

    Mine is 5.7mm thick vs 5.5mm of the old version, I think it will be a little faster than the older model
  5. Nittaku New Products 2024

    But not to head heavy
  6. Nittaku New Products 2024

    My acoustic inner carbon was 94g, a bit of a heavy weight
  7. Nittaku Accoustic Inner Carbon G-Revision FL Comparison

    How did you go with the Nittaku ACIC? Has it improved for you?
  8. DHS 301 or Butterfly Innerforce layer alc

    Thanks, so you have used both?
  9. DHS 301 or Butterfly Innerforce layer alc

    Thanks so you tried both? Does the 301 still have great touch/control and wood feel like the Korbel?
  10. Korbel

    Reply to review by 'steve888' on item 'Korbel'

    I use the Butterfly handle tape makes the handle slightly thicker without losing the feeling of the blade.
  11. DHS 301 or Butterfly Innerforce layer alc

    Hi, Wondering if anyone has tested both blades (DHS 301 and Butterfly Innerforce layer alc) ? Which has the most control and speed? Which blade do you prefer and why? Thanks
  12. Nittaku Accoustic Inner Carbon G-Revision FL Comparison

    Rozena 2.1 (FH) and sriver 2.1 (BH)
  13. Nittaku Accoustic Inner Carbon G-Revision FL Comparison

    That's heavy 193, mine is 183g with butterfly rubbers. Maybe get lighter rubbers.
  14. Nittaku Accoustic Inner Carbon G-Revision FL Comparison

    I used mine in training today, mine is 94g and 183/4g with the rubbers similar to my Korbel. It seemed plenty fast with the Rozena (FH) (at times to fast) and fair bit slower with the Sriver (BH), I think it depends on rubbers a bit. Interesting the TT review one was 82 g and 5.4mm thick, my G...
  15. Looking for Nittaku Acoustic Inner Carbon LGFL alternative

    I know the butterfly innerforce layer alc has limba piles as well. Limba tends to be softer provide more feeling and control. It's slightly thicker than the nittaku and I heard slightly faster. I haven't used it though.
  16. Nittaku Accoustic Inner Carbon G-Revision FL Comparison

    Okay. I just got the Nittaku acoustic inner g revision too in the last week. I like it. I use Rozena on the forehand and sriver on the backhand. Maybe your rubbers may not suit your style as much with that blade. I do noticed blades and rubbers take a bit of time to break in, happened with my...
  17. Nittaku Accoustic Inner Carbon G-Revision FL Comparison

    Why didn't you get the Butterfly Innerforce then if it was more comfortable and lighter?
  18. Looking for Nittaku Acoustic Inner Carbon LGFL alternative

    No, but I read the g revision is somewhere in between the large and small handle. Its 85mm circumferance at its thinnest point, about 2-3 mm more than my Korbel so slightly larger than the korbel flared blade. Similar to the Butterfly primorac handle. Very easy to hold and seems less head heavy...
  19. Blade advice - intermediate seeking step up

    The Nittaku acoustic inner carbon g revision, just upgraded from The Butterfly Korbel (japan). Both great blades. With limba piles for more feeling/control and reasonable speed.
Top