If you are basing assessments of rubbers on numbers from companies rating things like spin, you are in trouble. It you are using numbers of speed and spin ratings offered by players of varying skill levels with varying abilities to feel what they are doing, you are in more trouble.
The best way to judge things like that is to try those rubbers and see.
One of the reasons this is the case is that different rubbers perform differently with different kinds of contact and different players use different kinds of contact.
So if you were looping from mid-distance with Tenergy 05 and getting massive spin and then you used the same exact technique to loop with Hurricane 3, you probably wouldn't even get the ball on the table.
The other reason is obvious: a player with better touch and feeling is a player with better touch and feeling! A lower level player has less of an ability to judge differences and less of a background to compare different rubbers. Usually a lower rated player has not had the opportunity to try as many different kinds of rubbers and blades to make more informed opinions. And even if they had, that player may not have the ability to judge the differences between two rubbers in any useful kind of way.
And tabletennisdb does not sort out people who review based on their ability to feel the differences more accurately.
So those numbers could do more to confuse you than anything else if you are trying to think of them as literally as you are.
Sent from the Oracle of Delphi by the Pythia