Crazy post from you, really.
It
is crazy coming from me, that's why I put that disclaimer in. On the other hand, maybe I'm a very good example.
I have tested and played pretty much the entire spectrum over the past two years, ranging from thin 5ply, basically defensive blades, to 6.5mm 3+2 rocketships, and have put a very wide variety of rubbers on them, too.
It is absolutely fair to say that I can play 90-95% of my game with any of these setups. And some of them feel great right away, others feel horrible starting out, yet in the end they're all playable setups.
Is someone was to put a gun to my head, make me give away all my rackets and give me a random one. Threaten my life if I ever switch to something else. I
guarantee you I would simply get used to it and play a game I can enjoy with it, regardless what it is I had to end up with.
And for the overwhelming majority of amateur players, being able to play a game they can enjoy for the rest of their lives is pretty much the primary goal of playing table tennis.
Basically the same as I did in my teens/twenties: I didn't have any money to spare for equipment, so I played with what I had. I can promise you, my equipment was never really the problem even back then.
Sometimes it takes a crazy post to make a sensible point.
Equipment is important, and you actually know it's important.
What it is important for is certainly up for discussion and absolutely, technique is king.
But if someone says an Inner Carbon Blade with D05 is difficult to play with there is definitely some advice/experience that can be shared to help them.
That there is a 'right' racket is not a misconception, and the wrong racket also certainly exists.
I don't think Dignics, or even Glayzer, is *easy* to play on an Innerforce ALC. Coaching, especially from someone who understands what they are dealing with, is certainly going to make it a lot easier to deal with.
My point is, if the fact that they are struggling with this combination makes them look for "the right racket" and subsequently causes them to change setups multiple times expecting improvement, then that is an expectation that should probably be tempered.
And you know that point. You've made that before if I'm not mistaken. Changing a complete setup takes a long time to get used to, if not only to realize that the old setup might have actually been a better fit.