This user has no status.
You two might have just different definition of racism. Maybe the problem lies there.
Danny, You are literally writing:
In other words"
"It is not impressive to have high winrate like Shi Xunyao, because other Chinese players also have a winrate like that".
If You are not racist then it means that for You 97% winrate is not a big deal since You believe that many other players have winrate close to that. (and it doesn't matter if they are Chinese or not). Although it would is very easy to verify how ridiculous that believe is.
Unfortunatelly You have also written:
and that makes You a racist if we define racism like this:
"The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races."
You just think that when Chinese person has the same results as non-Chinese it is nothing special...so Chinese are just superior in Your eyes. Just like it wouldn't be impressive for cheetah to run 100m under 10s.
But...Oxford dictionary also defines "racism" as:
"Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."
and in that case Dany is not racist at all. It also looks like Dany was thinking about this definition all the time while Tony was thinking about the previous one.
So...can we close this now ? Your definitions of racism are just different and no one here is wrong since even Oxford dictionary has few definitions of racism that are entirely consistent (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/racism)
Danny, You are literally writing:
All i said was that it's not impressive for a Chinese player to have a winrate like Shi Xunyao did...
In other words"
"It is not impressive to have high winrate like Shi Xunyao, because other Chinese players also have a winrate like that".
If You are not racist then it means that for You 97% winrate is not a big deal since You believe that many other players have winrate close to that. (and it doesn't matter if they are Chinese or not). Although it would is very easy to verify how ridiculous that believe is.
Unfortunatelly You have also written:
Yes if it was a non chinese then i would say it's impressive
and that makes You a racist if we define racism like this:
"The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races."
You just think that when Chinese person has the same results as non-Chinese it is nothing special...so Chinese are just superior in Your eyes. Just like it wouldn't be impressive for cheetah to run 100m under 10s.
But...Oxford dictionary also defines "racism" as:
"Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."
and in that case Dany is not racist at all. It also looks like Dany was thinking about this definition all the time while Tony was thinking about the previous one.
Also, being sick and tired of the chinese dominance is one thing and just hating chinese people is another. If i was the latter then you could call me a racist.
So...can we close this now ? Your definitions of racism are just different and no one here is wrong since even Oxford dictionary has few definitions of racism that are entirely consistent (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/racism)
Last edited: