Does anyone have info on this rubber. Might be a good comparison to butterfly 05fx from what I've read.
And also if anyone has the cutter weight on it also.
And also if anyone has the cutter weight on it also.
Tibhar Evolution FX-D
- Thread starter Zion
- Start date
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Active Member
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
I would like to know more about Tibhar FX-D. I watched the video (in German). I'd like to get more input.
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
Well-Known Member
I recently bought some sheets of FX-D and play a very flexible topspin attacking game.
I can say that FX-D is one of the few rubbers that out of the box can immediately play the same way as T05FX.
That doesn't mean it feels the same, but it it give you great spin and control with the same shots. You can really hit hard and still land it, especially hard hits vs incoming topspin. You can REALLY bang it.
I can say that FX-D is one of the few rubbers that out of the box can immediately play the same way as T05FX.
That doesn't mean it feels the same, but it it give you great spin and control with the same shots. You can really hit hard and still land it, especially hard hits vs incoming topspin. You can REALLY bang it.
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
Do you use the fx-d on forehand or backhand?
I wonder if he holds what you describe on the forehand as well. If so, he would indeed be a candidate to replace my Omega V Euro.
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
Well-Known Member
I use FX-D on BH right now... I COULD use it on FH, but honestly, I now play firmer rubbers on FH MUCH better than I did a few years ago, so BH it will be for FX-D.
FX-D is the true mold of modern dynamic soft sponged rubber... a real juicy rubber on big swings.
FX-D is the true mold of modern dynamic soft sponged rubber... a real juicy rubber on big swings.
This user has no status.
Well-Known Member
I agree with this description. Often soft(er) rubbers lack in either spin, power or both. And as with other Tibhar Evolution rubbers, the price is competitive, especially for the quality given.
This user has no status.
Can you describe how different it feels to say, FX-P? I used to use FX-P on my backhand.
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
Well-Known Member
FX-D feels a tad softer... easier to get ball into wood.
FX-P felt very linear with some top end... FX-D is way more dynamic on top end.
FX-P felt like a medium firm sponge on light impacts (maybe topsheet/)... FX-P feels same softness.
FX-P felt very linear with some top end... FX-D is way more dynamic on top end.
FX-P felt like a medium firm sponge on light impacts (maybe topsheet/)... FX-P feels same softness.
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
I tried the FX-D yesterday. One word...WOW!!! The Red Energy Sponge catapults the ball, with the softer sponge on the FX rubbers, there is more control. I will have to use it more, but I really like it.
Good day to you sir,
Does FX-D play the same spin as T05FX.
Thank you for your kind reply.
Best regards,
This user has no status.
Hi guys,
the FX-D seems to be really interesting for me, because i like to play with medium sponge rubbers, currently both on fh and bh.
For me the FX is kinda misleading, because it suggests a softer sponged rubber.
Nevertheless, i'm currently playing C1 on both sides. But i could be interested in the FX-D on the fh side and FX-S on the bh side.
Is anyone able to compare these there rubbers? And what would be changed for me if i pick the FX-S on bh and FX-D on fh.
Thank you guys in advance. Btw i'm a controlled looper which like to attack on both wings as soon as possible.
the FX-D seems to be really interesting for me, because i like to play with medium sponge rubbers, currently both on fh and bh.
For me the FX is kinda misleading, because it suggests a softer sponged rubber.
Nevertheless, i'm currently playing C1 on both sides. But i could be interested in the FX-D on the fh side and FX-S on the bh side.
Is anyone able to compare these there rubbers? And what would be changed for me if i pick the FX-S on bh and FX-D on fh.
Thank you guys in advance. Btw i'm a controlled looper which like to attack on both wings as soon as possible.
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
says
2023 Certified Organ Donor
Well-Known Member
FX-S is a little bouncier on the low to medium impacts than FX-D.
Both make great spin on full swings.
Both make great spin on full swings.
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
FX-D plays great! Even though the sponge is medium-soft at about 45 degrees, it plays as an offensive threat. I created great spin on serves and counter loops were fantastic. It produced nice arc on counter topspins. This rubber is a keeper!
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
This user has no status.
This user has no status.
Member
I've only tried it a few times, but if it's anything like other Tibhar rubbers, I would think it's very durable.
Hi, so your are not too happy with the C1? Have you already dealt with the FX-S and are you able to describe the difference? I guess that probably C1 is less bouncy than FX-S, but has better durability.
I am asking because I currently have FX-S on BH and I plan to test C1 on BH at the next replacement (because I use G1 on FH and I like this rubber, but on BH I prefer something a little softer).
This user has no status.
I've tried both the FX-P and FX-S, how different is the FX-D from the FX-S?
Also used the EL-D for a month, wonder if the FX-D has the same topsheet as the EL-D but with a softer sponge?
Also used the EL-D for a month, wonder if the FX-D has the same topsheet as the EL-D but with a softer sponge?
Similar threads
