Can you point out where you have written the equations that you claim to understand?
Well, in case he means people should be able to produce sufficient spin against him with a dead rubber I think that is a valid statement. For that purpose 80rev/sec is sufficient. Maybe a beach sandal would be sufficient equipment.
I'm a bass player so I don't bother anyone... but I love to put my amp and cabinets near those acoustic guitar players to make them understand the power of feedbacknoise bombs are a reality. Now iffen you would send both , James Z and BB out basking with a
Shakuhachi flute , all people within about 50m would instantly disappear. Another good instrument which has the same effect on many people is a bagpipe .
My personal favorite is a Sopranino Sax, When the highest notes are blown, blood streams out of my eyes ears and nose
Good on ye, powerful weapon a bass.I'm a bass player so I don't bother anyone... but I love to put my amp and cabinets near those acoustic guitar players to make them understand the power of feedback
Ok, i will let him know and see if he will choose it and being a happy lil'camper like you 😁
That is insulting. Would you understand them, Wannabee? Did you ever get your degree you were trying for years ago. I believe it was for electrical engineering.
Zeio document said power drive. Not brush loop. Can you explain how there can be so much spin, 180 rev/sec, with the list paddle speed?
Seriously, you don't know how to play table tennis. You parrot a lot of things that betray an ignorance of what it actually takes to play high level tennis. Then you hide behind claims about understanding a system with mathematics that even the mathematicians who model it will tell you that their models are simplistic and of limited value for explaining the dynamics of high level play. Good players wigh physics backgrounds are far more humble about what they can say about the physics of table tennis because they know that high level table tennis is largely composed of tacit knowledge acquired over many years. It is much easier to try something and learn from it than to pretend that sophisticated modeling will give you an understanding that makes you a better player. You were one of the low level posters at mytt that said something about all that matters is what happens at contact which failed to account for how the backswing and the follow through could create a turning effect that may not be easily described just by focusing on the contact. But you play at too low a level to actually understand this and you then parrot the advice people give to beginners about not changing your racket angle during the stroke. The bottom line here is that you need to play much better table tennis to be taken seriously. I do commend you for posting your play so that people know how seriously to take you.
For the record, I had the engineering degree years before I started playing TT. You seem to have a very bad memory for academic credentials, often making them up for players you respect and disparaging those of people you don't like. In any case there is no point making up for your low level play with bad arguments based on models whose limitations you play at too low a level to understand. Have you ever hit a loop drive before? Can you post of video of you hitting one?
There's no way a commoner can get 80 rev/s with a dead bat with the new plastic ball. 80 rev/s = 4800 rpm and is nothing to sneeze at. Note that based on Hawkeye results Ma Long frequently only loops at 6000+rpm, and that's with boosted tacky Hurricanes and it's Ma Long the greatest of all time looping with perfect biomechanics. Xu Xin used to be the highest spin Looper by far and even he only gets high 7000+rpm when they were measuring it. Of course these are during matches where they're not giving 120% energy but have to land the shot with good percentages. But it is a good barometer to use.
A new claim. So you got your degree before 2009. OK. What have you done with it?
That was many years ago. You never have shown any engineering or physics knowledge on a TT forum.
You claimed you could beat me with a 7 ball handicap once. Idle boast. Again, my 3rd coach had a rating of 2500 and he couldn't beat me with a 6 ball handicap.
He can't even produce a backtested model after boasting so much about it. There's many practicing engineers on this site (myself being one with a decade of experience designing in many big projects - VictorMoraga is another it seems). In real life we never use any model which hasn't been backtested against real life physics (read: experimental data), especially if the risks are big. And you need to be able to defend your model when people ask questions of it, not just attack the questioner, otherwise you will never get approval from the authorities lol...
You guys don't know shit. Show where I am wrong! It is that simple. So far you have done nothing but criticize without proof.
That isn't true. It is if risks are big but how to you test an airplane lauch or a rocket launch.
Again, explain how a paddle moving 17.6 m/s generates a spin of 180 rev/sec.
This statement precisely betrays your lack of knowledge of actual real world engineering. If you follow SpaceX for eg, every single component of a rocket is meticulously tested to verify their modelling and calculations. And if there's any anomalous behaviour they will postpone launches until the issue is actually fixed and rectified. It is even more stringent with airplanes. Otherwise why bother with wind tunnels and rocket test fires?
It appears that he is not even a good engineer given he thinks that people launch rockets and airplanes without extensive model testing and verification 😂
The saddest part is that while it is pickleball, there is enough there to point out clearly that brokenball is being silly - zeio quoted all the relevant parts and if I felt brokenball was worth taking seriously I would read the papers.
Just to save me looking, does anyone have links to the videos BB posted of his play?
