The other day I tried a friends blade to test his Fastarc G1 and his blade was a Nittaku Violin.
For context I used to play a Primorac when I was a kid/teenager and did enjoy the blade very much. Recently I bought an another one to test, in fact I bought two, the European one that felt good but had a terrible slim handle and a Japanese one that felt like a wet noodle. Too flexy for the modern ball and I attributed that to the thinness of the blade. It's weird considering that they both were the "same" blade and had about the same weight (90gr).
I also had an Acoustic that felt much more rigid than the Primorac, faster but at the same time "pingy" or bouncy on the short game. It felt great but for some reason it didn't click with me.
I completely disregarded the Violin because I felt it would be similar to the Primorac and wouldn't be stable enough for the plastic ball but I was completely wrong but don't understand why. The blade is fast enough, stable for blocking and counter looping, not bouncy, really controlled but it shouldn't be that way. I would say it's as stable as my Hugo HAL despite being slower.
My friend had a Tenergy 05 on the Violin and even that felt fast but controllable, that for me was the biggest surprise considering I was testing it on the backhand and never felt the characteristic bounciness of the T05.
What am I missing? Is this some kind of unicorn my friend got or is the Violin that good? Why did the blade felt stable despite the thinness? Is this because the outer plies are from harder wood?
For context I used to play a Primorac when I was a kid/teenager and did enjoy the blade very much. Recently I bought an another one to test, in fact I bought two, the European one that felt good but had a terrible slim handle and a Japanese one that felt like a wet noodle. Too flexy for the modern ball and I attributed that to the thinness of the blade. It's weird considering that they both were the "same" blade and had about the same weight (90gr).
I also had an Acoustic that felt much more rigid than the Primorac, faster but at the same time "pingy" or bouncy on the short game. It felt great but for some reason it didn't click with me.
I completely disregarded the Violin because I felt it would be similar to the Primorac and wouldn't be stable enough for the plastic ball but I was completely wrong but don't understand why. The blade is fast enough, stable for blocking and counter looping, not bouncy, really controlled but it shouldn't be that way. I would say it's as stable as my Hugo HAL despite being slower.
My friend had a Tenergy 05 on the Violin and even that felt fast but controllable, that for me was the biggest surprise considering I was testing it on the backhand and never felt the characteristic bounciness of the T05.
What am I missing? Is this some kind of unicorn my friend got or is the Violin that good? Why did the blade felt stable despite the thinness? Is this because the outer plies are from harder wood?