This user has no status.
This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Well-Known Member
I don't believe the opponent will suffer the same magnitude of disadvantage from this slightly curled edged rubber compared to hiding service contact. VAR is a lot more important here. sure, not being able to boost this way would be disadvantageous for the Chinese but not that much advantageous for the opponentView attachment 41489This isn’t really the right topic for this observation of mine, but I’d rather write it here while it’s still fresh in my mind.
Let’s make one thing clear right from the start – I have never tuned or boosted rubbers, and I don’t even know exactly how it is properly done. Basically, I don’t have a clearly defined opinion about tuning or boosting rubbers — I’m neither for it nor against it.. However, I do believe that consistency in respecting the rules should apply to all aspects of the game.
Since I am also a referee with many years of experience, it seems ridiculous to me that on one hand we use VAR to check whether a player tossed the ball at 29, 31, or 30.04 degrees on serve, or whether the ball was hidden for 0.02 seconds by the server’s head – and then declare the serve illegal based on VAR – while on the other hand racket control is conducted like this (as the rubber shown in this photo).
Either the rules should be enforced absolutely in every segment, or we should simply allow players to play the best they can.
In my opinion, using VAR for service control is completely pointless if, at the same time, a rubber like this can pass racket inspection.
Last edited: