This user has no status.
🏆 Top 1% Commenter
Well-Known Member
Well-Known Member
Moderator
There is clearly a difference betweenThat's what the expectation has been for Matsushima in Japan for several years now. Even Harimoto said it took Matsushima longer than expected to reach this stage.
Folks in the West can't expect to apply their values in East Asia. Japan, in particular, has a tradition and a system of "manufacturing" table tennis prodigies. Miyazaki even explicitly stated they needed new aces like Harimoto and Hirano for both MT and WT back in 2017 and they had started a project to "produce" 188 boys, girls and coaches each for 2024 and 2028, expecting results in 10 years, which is this year, 2026. Kawakami seems to be the forerunner for the time being.
2019/4/21
https://www.tabletennisdaily.com/fo...e-tennis-championships-2019.20811/post-269954
2025/10/19
https://www.tabletennisdaily.com/fo...or-wttc-finals-2026-2-16-17.35128/post-546452
第58回
日本卓球界を復活に導いた「大改革」
宮﨑 義仁
https://www.ssf.or.jp/knowledge/history/interview/058.html
(- What about player development and strengthening for 2020?
We need new aces for both men and women. Currently, it would be Harimoto Tomokazu for the men and Hirano Miu for the women.
If these top two strive for greater heights, they will surely inspire those around them. All the current players have that potential, which will lead to an overall improvement in the level of Japanese rugby.
Therefore, I believe that how we can elevate Harimoto and Hirano will be a crucial key to success in 2020. Also, with an eye on 2024 and 2028, we began strengthening 188 boys and girls in the fourth grade and below, along with their 188 coaches, starting in July 2016. I'm confident that the results will become apparent in about 10 years.)
1: Applying "Western values" to judge a Japanese situation.
2. Explaining quite bluntly that 18 year olds are immature and that table tennis improvement is not a linear process.
BTW, since there was 188, where are the other 187? Was Matsushima the best of them? And is the expectation for a prodigy linear development? Is it possible that a prodigy can get to a higher point on a longer schedule?
It's funny that Matsushima now has as many World Cup silvers and Senior national championships as Harimoto. Maybe Harimoto was fast to start, but he hasn't won much in the last few years. Is it Western to point that out?
PS: Isn't there a clear conflict between "Matsushima was a huge benefactor of nepotism" and "Matsushima took longer than expected to reach this stage" - if nepotism was the main thing, why expect him to reach this stage at all?
Last edited: